Google Search

eobot

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Challenge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Challenge. Show all posts

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Podcasting Faces Measurement Challenge

2-6-2015

Apple is the force behind most podcast activity, but only provides limited data to publishers and advertisers creating frustration in the podcast marketplace. About 70% of all podcasts reach consumers via iTunes, and due to privacy concerns, many in the podcast biz believe that Apple has no plans to share its data, according to an article on Digiday. The availability and quality of podcasting data on advertising consumption falls far behind data available for other digital media.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

The Challenge Of Selling Spots & Digital In A Digital World

9-17-2014

By Jeff Schmidt

Imagine if Erica Farber stood in front of the radio station owners at this year?s Radio Show and asked for their help and support to eliminate ratings fraud. Imagine if the Wall Street Journal published a report saying that somewhere between 36 and 50 percent of diaries or PPMs are frauds ? not actually humans listening, but machines manipulating the system. If any of that happened, all hell would break loose. Thankfully, the radio industry is better than that.

That is not going to happen.
This is. The Wall Street Journal, March 23, 2014, headline: ?A ?Crisis? in Online Ads: One-Third of Traffic Is Bogus.? Subtitle: ?As Digital Advertising Climbs Toward $50 Billion This Year, Marketers Battle Fraudulent Visitors.? The article goes on to say that billions of dollars are flowing into online advertising, even as marketers are confronting an uncomfortable reality: rampant fraud. According to the WSJ, the market for online ads is expected to cross $50 billion this year. The clear implication ? which isn?t stated explicitly, but also never refuted ? is that online advertisers are being collectively defrauded of $18 billion.

Interactive Advertising Bureau Chairman and Ziff Davis CEO Vivek Shah called on the industry to recognize the problem and clean up its act. ?The industry will never realize its potential if it doesn?t take the matter seriously and fix it now,? Shah said.

Shah cast the net of blame widely, implicating not just unscrupulous actors but also publishers and agencies. ?We?ve got to stop devaluing digital media,? he told a room full of online publishers, agency executives, and ad tech vendors at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting. ?It?s simple: No more traffic fraud. Let?s end it.?

According to Shah, a full 36 percent of all Web traffic is nonhuman traffic. Other ad execs suggest the figure is closer to 50 percent. ?There?s nothing more damaging to our industry than fraudulent traffic,? Shah said.

Meanwhile, radio and TV stations are jumping into the digital space with both feet. Who can blame them? There is a ton of money being spent there. Do stations know what they are doing? Do sellers know what they?re selling? Or are we simply trading dollars and hurting radio by adopting digital strategies? As we embrace this platform, these are some of the questions that must be answered.

Today, the amount of money being spent on digital advertising is growing at a head-spinning pace. In 2012, it topped $102 billion worldwide. An article in Forbes magazine says this about the future of ad spending: ?Digital now commands nearly one in five ad dollars, the market researcher notes. What?s more, it?s continuing to grow at a rapid clip, forecast to stay at double-digit increases through at least 2015. This year, eMarketer reckons online ad sales will rise 15.1%, to $118.4 billion. And by 2016, digital ad spending will pass a quarter of all ad dollars.?

Compare that to the money spent on TV advertising in 2012, at $63.8 billion, and radio, at $17.6 billion, and you can understand why broadcast companies are trying to figure out digital.

In preparing to write this story, I had the pleasure of interviewing some of the best radio directors of sales in the country. Their answers were insightful and helpful, and show what successful radio people are thinking about digital these days.

Amy Leimbach is the director of sales for Alpha Media in Portland, OR.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Leimbach:
Advertisers these days are confused by those choices. We sell advertising for our business and we are supposed to understand what our competition is doing every day. Imagine what it?s like for an advertiser trying to run a business and their core competency is to be running, for example, an HVAC dealership. Their number one task of the day is to try and figure out how to get their salespeople to sell more air conditioning units right now. A lot of times advertising and marketing falls down the list. So it?s easy for them to be taken advantage of, I think. They don?t understand it, but then all they hear is, ?Oh, you gotta be in digital, you gotta be in digital,? so they tend to be confused and they buy in to the bright shiny object out there.

How important is brand strategy in the digital space?
Leimbach:
This is the biggest problem with digital: You have to have a brand before you get there. So people think they can just use digital, but once the consumer gets online, how are they supposed to decipher the right brand to go to? So you still need to have radio to build recall. Because once you?re online, you have to go, ?Oh, yeah, that?s right, I heard of Dick Hannah dealerships on the air, so I?m going to click through to that one when I?m going to make my purchase for my Kia. I?m not going to go to this one because I?ve never heard of it before.?

Spending on digital advertising is not showing any signs of letting up. Where is that money coming from?
Leimbach:
I feel like all those newspaper dollars, where we were fighting to get a piece of the market for so many years ? I mean, the poor newspaper industry, whatever, I don?t feel that sorry for them because they got their share for a long time ? but that money literally leapfrogged over us and went straight over to digital.

What do sales reps need to know about digital?
Leimbach:
I think that reps need to remember that using digital is just using one of your tools in the toolbox, and it?s helping you execute a wellthought- out campaign. It starts out on-air, and the online is one of the execution pieces of it. They need to remember that it starts on-air; it starts with a traditional brand. I think people sometimes think of the tactics first and they should think of the strategy first. To me, that?s the most important thing: Think strategically about what you?re going to do to try to accomplish your clients? goals, and then put the tactics behind it. Don?t go in with the tactics first.

How do you teach sellers the fundamentals of advertising and radio, brand marketing strategy creation, and then digital?
Leimbach:
You have to lead by example. I think that sales managers need to be out on the streets with their salespeople. I think that?s the best way for them to learn. Most sales managers were probably really talented salespeople, so if they go on more calls, they can hand-hold and walk through the process with their sellers so that the sellers feel comfortable with it. If you?re leading by example, then they end up learning it.

What?s your greatest frustration with digital?
Leimbach:
The clients seem to be so dazzled by something that they can?t even put their finger on it. [Laughs] I?ll have car dealers who, without a bat of the eye, will drop 20 grand on some shiny new object with digital. We ask them to spend 20 grand with us and it?s like extracting teeth from them sometimes.

What?s working best so far in terms of generating digital revenue for you in Portland?
Leimbach:
Adding streaming to our buys is adding the most new revenue. Then, really, the good old NTR programs that we?ve done for decades. Instead of using entry boxes and printing up little flyers, we just use digital to execute all these ideas now. We have lots of success tied to NTR dollars. I feel really good about those dollars being tied to digital because that?s how we are making the programs live.

Cory Cuddeback is the director of sales for Beasley Broadcast Group in Las Vegas.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Cuddeback:
Well, with selling digital, my sales reps aren?t real comfortable selling it, because they don?t really understand it. Obviously, what we want to do is use our existing relationships to sell our clients digital, and the sales reps are intimidated because they are afraid if they sell a digital package to an existing client, and there are any challenges with execution or results, they could damage their existing relationship and it could possibly cause them to lose a good spot-buying customer.

Are you asking them to sell digital as a standalone product or digital tied only to a traditional media schedule, such as with radio?
Cuddeback:
Both. There are a lot of clients that don?t do radio and we are trying to get in the door using our digital assets in hopes of also selling them radio time. With existing spot buyers, we are trying to incorporate different digital assets into their buy. So the plan moving forward is to start as many conversations as we can, and if we need to use digital as a wedge to get in the door, that?s what we are doing. What we are finding out is a lot of clients just want to do digital, but we are also finding clients that, once we can start establishing a relationship by talking about digital, we can start having a conversation about radio as well.

Here?s the deal: I can build a beautiful website for a client. If that client doesn?t tell people, via radio, TV, electronic media, about their beautiful website, it doesn?t really do any good. You can sell just digital, but there is no better advertising than word-of-mouth, and digital can?t create top-of-mind awareness or get a good buzz or create word-of-mouth about a business. The only way to do that is with, in my opinion, electronic media. I can?t create a jingle in the digital world and have someone remember a business through audio, through a jingle.

Where is this new digital money coming from?
Cuddeback:
It is coming from everywhere. It is coming from radio. It is coming from newspaper. It is coming from TV. That?s all people talk about now, it seems like. There is a car dealer in Vegas that moved from TV and radio and now spends 100 percent of his budget on digital. When you see things happen like that, you have to pay attention and get into that space.

How do you prevent your sellers from trading dollars?
Cuddeback:
That?s a really good question, because trading dollars from radio airtime into digital costs me money because of the hard costs of the digital products that we are selling. Although I am saving my airtime and able to sell my airtime to another client, it?s kind of a Catch-22. If I?m dealing with a radio station that has a lot of demand and typically in a sold-out situation, and that seller is trading dollars for digital, I am OK with it, because it frees airtime for me to sell to somebody else. In most cases, I don?t have a problem if they are moving off-air into digital.

You talk about salespeople being intimidated and salespeople not understanding. How do you fix that?
Cuddeback:
Well, right now, the way I am trying to fix it is to hire someone as a full-time digital director for my cluster that can show the other sellers that it is OK, they can sell this, and nothing is going to go completely and horribly wrong. The answer is really to have some of my sellers gravitate more to selling digital products and to hire someone who has been doing it for a number of years that can hold their hand and help them through the process.

What do salespeople need to do differently?
Cuddeback:
I want every salesperson that I have to be a solution provider and to be able to sell everything I have. That would be the ultimate goal, to really be a consultant and to be able to walk into a business and talk to the owner and have all of these solutions for them. That would be my ideal world, but I am not sure I want reps to be able to go into a business and say, ?Here?s radio and here is how it works. What?s going to happen when I run your radio schedule is people are going to go online and do their research. So, why don?t we help you with your website? Why don?t we help you with your search engine optimization, and do everything all at once?? In fact, we have a client now that is waiting to do radio with me until his website is right and until he has everything digitally where he needs to be, because he understands that he doesn?t want to spend a bunch of money in radio before his digital presence is correct. That?s kind of where I want my sellers to be.

Why do some people think radio doesn?t work anymore?
Cuddeback:
In today?s world, when I run a radio commercial, when it relates to getting business for that customer, guess who gets the credit? The Internet. I run a commercial, and you know how it goes. They hear 10 to 20 percent of what the message says. So they go on Google. They do the research. They find the business. They call the business. The business asks ?How did you hear about us?? and the person says, ?On the Internet.? That?s the big challenge. That, I think, is really damaging our business.

But aren?t we feeding that monster?
Cuddeback:
Yes. Because the businesses that want to find out where their customers are coming from, over the past few years, the Internet is their number one source for getting their clients. They forget that they have spent the last 10 years advertising their brand on radio. They forget that people have heard their commercial and are influenced by that commercial, enough so to go find them, search for them on the Internet, and then the Internet gets the business. In most business owners? minds, all this business is coming from the Internet ? when the fact is, it started way before the Internet.

As a manager, how do you keep track of all of that, and how do you manage your people and their level of knowledge?
Cuddeback:
It drives me absolutely crazy. You know, 20 years ago, we sold radio. That is all we sold. Now the salespeople are spinning 20 plates at one time and it is hard to focus on any one thing. There has been such a push to sell digital because of what is happening around us ? a lot of focus has left the pure radio play. That is really, really scaring me, because our eye is off our main source of revenue, which is radio. Managing the time that sellers
spend learning and selling digital versus pounding the pavement selling radio, is really scary. My boss, in fact, just the other day, asked me what percentage of our time I thought we should focus on digital. If you look at the big picture and say, ?Well, look at how much more money is being spent digitally, now surpassing radio,? you would think that a lot of your time would be spent selling digital. But then you?re putting your core business of radio in the back seat. And that really has me nervous.

Traci Northrop is director of sales for the Milwaukee Radio Group (Saga Communications) in Milwaukee.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Northrop:
Well I think digital provides two opportunities. One is often forgotten, and that is that it?s an extension of our brand. It?s a way for us to reach our listeners on a level of ?Hey we?ve got this weekend special going on,? or ?Hey, join us at this event where we are going to register you to win a Harley-Davidson.? That?s the one we often forget about because everyone is just looking at this as a revenue stream. I don?t think we?ve figured out, as an industry, how to capitalize on it, or that we completely understand it, but we just know we should. So we are all just jumping on the bandwagon right now.

How does digital fit in a well-executed marketing campaign?
Northrop:
You have to be consistent, and it has to be an extension of something that brings it all back home. Like, ?I heard about the fact that I can win this prize, this Harley- Davidson, and now I received a text showing where I can now register to win it, and then I look at the website and I can see the whole list of events of where I can go.? We use it really well, and that?s how we have to teach our clients to use it, the same way we do. Fully integrated. Not as a standalone, but as part an overall campaign.

How do you monetize it in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
First of all, we won?t sell social media for the sake of pure advertising. Like, ?You should buy a car at this particular dealership.? But if we are going to be at that dealership and it?s a station event, then we can use our social media to help bring that traffic around and use it as one of the tools to increase our success at that event. For example, we won?t sell an ad on our Facebook page saying, ?You should call these people to cater your summer picnic.? We won?t do that. We will post on Facebook that we are going to be at this particular car dealership and you can meet this personality. So it?s definitely interwoven in everything. But it?s not a standalone. Otherwise it?s kind of like a sellout.

Do broadcast companies have an advantage with digital platforms?
Northrop:
There was a report out from Twitter that something like 8 percent of their online usage, or 23 million users, are actually bots! So how do you know what you?re getting? If you?re looking for numbers, they can generate massive numbers, but are they real? I would rather sell something I can believe in. That?s a combination of radio with the right amount of digital added on, when it makes sense. People are oftentimes asking for it and they don?t know what they are asking, or it?s just that shiny new thing.

That?s why we have to value our likes and our people more, because we?re not creating fake profiles to boost the numbers. These are actually people that said, ?I love WKLH.? These aren?t bots, they are people ? real people ? real traffic. Everyone that is engaged with us on social media is a real person. That?s why we have to value it more too.

What sort of training do reps need, and how do you provide it?
Northrop:
Well Saga has an interactive digital sales support team. We receive help from a platform basis where they will send out ideas and contests. We get good support with questions on how to understand things. We have people come to the market that show us better ideas, better ways of doing things. Then our digital guy, our website guy, is actually in our building. That?s another Saga great thing; not a lot of people can walk across the hall and talk to their Web dude. Which is what we call him: our Web dude.

Are radio and TV stations making money on digital?
Northrop:
I think we?d like to think so, but we don?t take the time to stop and actually figure out how to best charge for this and then get all of us on the same page. Some of us aren?t charging for it and just handing it out, number one. Number two, some people are acting like they are charging for it but they are not actually getting more money, they?re just reclassifying it in the budget line. So we are bamboozling ourselves.

So in some cases, when it?s a condition of being on the buy, if one group relents and says, ?OK, yeah, we?ll do that,? it kind of puts the rest of the groups in a bad position. Here we are trying to value what we have and what we?ve built, literally built from one user on. We?ve built our own Facebook page and we?ve put great content on there and we engage our listeners. And you?re going to give it away for free?

So we?ve got to unite and say, ?You know it?s not worth nothing, but it?s not worth top of the rate card. Somewhere in the middle, we have to meet.?

Are there dangers to selling digital?
Northrop:
If you lose sight of the fact that radio is your main product and this is just another great way to help reach your audience to generate traffic for your client, and to make your client memorable. Then you?re losing sight of everything. Then you can just go work for a dotcom company. If you?re in radio, you have to sell radio with digital. The message is clear. Stick to the core, but digital is something that can definitely help radio be more effective for ourselves and for our clients.

What digital products are working best for you in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
Saga does a really good job of maintaining our text clubs and giving people rewards for being members and engaging the customers. We have a process. If someone wants to get out a text, it?s not an ?OK.? We go through the program director and say, ?Does this make sense to you and can we encapsulate it in the amount of characters?? Texting works reallywell, Facebook works really well. Those are the two things I?ve found get the best results when used correctly.

Is digital here to stay?
Northrop:
It?s amazing, it?s like everyone is in a panic to participate. It?s like when all the radio stations went out to buy a PT Cruiser as a station vehicle, they were all the rage. You couldn?t even get them, they were in such demand. Now I don?t see anyone excited about PT Cruisers. Digital is like the PT Cruiser, except that it?s not going to go away. But it?s part of a five-course meal. We?re just adding courses and more ability to reach and engage people to get results for advertisers and to provide content for our listeners from our brands. The more we can engage, the more loyal they will be to us.

The consensus appears to be that digital offerings of broadcast companies are first and foremost an extension of your own brands. It allows them to connect more deeply and more frequently with their audience. As a result of that connection, they allow advertisers to utilize the digital presence of the station for their own marketing strategies. Stations, in turn, have a new source of revenue beyond traditional advertising.

My first foray into selling digital, back in 2006, was clearly a case of trading dollars. I felt I needed to leverage digital with radio because nobody believed in digital at the time. I know I didn?t. Today it?s hard not to believe in digital advertising?s ability to extend an already strong campaign. We have to resist, however, making digital more than what it is. It?s a tool.

Jeff Schmidt is EVP and partner with Chris Lytle at Sparque Inc.
You can reach him at Jeff.Schmidt@Sparque.biz,
Twitter: @JeffreyASchmidt

Send me your comments directly or post them below this story.

(9/26/2014 1:03:43 PM)
Digital pricing reflects the demand and the CPM is adjusted accordingly. Certainly there is fraud, but if the results aren't there the CPM will drop...simple supply and demand.

However, we directly attribute some of our client's traffic to bots - it's the same noise we all have. A TV spot on the bar monitor...a print ad in the back of the newsstand that is returned...or an unlit billboard at night.

Great article...exciting times...

(9/26/2014 9:53:10 AM)
Best piece I've read on the topic in a while! Thank you curating these perspectives and helping me focus my own.
(9/26/2014 8:40:38 AM)
Excellent and very insightful. Always go back to the base, radio and then "add the fries" to encompass both.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, November 10, 2013

A Challenge For Pandora

11-7-13
(by Radio Ink Publisher Eric Rhoads)

Some within the radio industry are calling Pandora out. The latest came from Clear Channel CFO Richard Bressler. Pandora, which each month releases its own metrics on listening hours and share of U.S. radio listening, claimed that it had 8 percent of all radio listening in in October. Clear Channel doesn't buy it, because other statistics say the total of all radio listening online makes up only 8 percent. That's all Internet radio stations and services combined, including Pandora -- and iHeart, TuneIn, Slacker, and thousands of others.
But Pandora continues to issue releases about its numbers, and people are buying it -- including many advertisers who have seen Pandora's impressive presentations about its audience.
In fact, radio, with repeated calls for Pandora to step up and prove its numbers and methodology, may be playing right into Pandora's hands: Pandora could easily claim radio is just being defensive because the industry feels threatened.
And they might have a point: It's not helpful for radio to appear to be on the defensive. If Pandora is so insignificant, why does radio keep talking about it? I had that very reaction when Pandora issued a press release saying its listening levels actually went up the week Apple's iRadio was announced -- I thought Pandora wouldn't make such an announcement unless they were running scared.

I co-sponsored an online radio event at the Wizard Academy recently, and I was surprised by the way advertisers were enamored with Pandora -- and how few were asking the tough questions, like "Can you prove your numbers?" Pandora is a new shiny object, and there are advertisers who want to believe in its success.
Meanwhile, every radio station has to prove its numbers with advertisers every day, as they demand ratings from credible sources like Nielsen Audio, which has to adhere to specific standards from the Media Rating Council. Where is the demand from advertisers for Pandora to prove its numbers are accurate?

This game needs to stop. The advertising industry needs to hold Pandora to the same standards they hold all other media. They need to demand an apples-to-apples comparison of Pandora and terrestrial radio listening, and refuse to support Pandora until it allows a third party to verify the accuracy of its numbers. Frankly, Pandora should be glad for an opportunity to prove its figures are valid.

Pandora entered the radio space in hopes of acquiring radio's audiences and advertisers. If Pandora truly believes its numbers are accurate, it's time to step up and prove it.

I invite Pandora CEO Brian McAndrews to talk about the numbers face-to-face with a radio-industry audience at my Forecast conference November 20 in New York. If Pandora's numbers are accurate, there is nothing to hide, and may the best win.

Pandora: Time to step up and live by the standards of all other media.

(11/9/2013 9:03:37 AM)
Pandora, ignore them!

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, May 16, 2013

FM Translators Can be a Challenge

5-13-13

It seems an age ago when the FCC opened an application window for FM Translators.  In the waning days of 2002 I began working with a number of Public and College Noncommercial FM Stations to help them file applications for FM translators in their fringe areas.  In many places NCE FM stations don't reach out as well as their commercial brethren, due to crowded spectrum in the reserved band, and because many are low power, some as small as 10 Watts.  I realized that few of the New Jersey and Philadelphia noncommercial stations reached the "Jersey Shore." Reaching the vacation spot for their regular listeners would be a great boon to them, but in general they had limited budgets, constrained by donations and grants.

If several translators could be multiplexed onto one tower, then these stations could afford to have an affordable presence on the shore for their listeners on vacation.  Since tower rent dominates the cost of running a translator, it made sense to put them all in one place and pay tower rent only once.  I filed applications at several locations around New Jersey, at each location I filed for several available frequencies with the idea of repeating several different public or college stations in the region from a single antenna.  I chose each of these locations because I could drive to the translator site within a few hours to service them.  Servicing five translators and a multiplexer at one location was not much more difficult than servicing one.  This was my modest goal.

For this I was called a "translator whore" and vilified on the broadcast bulletin boards. My applications were pursued by Petitions to Deny from commercial broadcasters who saw FM translators as polluting the band.  In the initial flurry of FCC activity I received three construction permits, one of which I promptly built and repeats a nearby small Non Commercial FM station, and the other two were encumbered by multiple petitions to deny from commercial broadcasters. I could not build them because the construction permits could be rescinded if the FCC agreed with the petitioners.  When the Low Power FM fever struck, and the FCC froze processing the thousands of FM translator applications that were pending.

Fast forward nine years.

One of these FM Translator construction permits was challenged because I had no "assurance of site availability".  Various petitions, oppositions, petitions for reconsideration and other actions in an extended legal dance where the FCC changed its position three times -the FCC finally rescinded the construction permit for W250BA this March. 

I researched whether it would be worth asking for reconsideration.  I went back to the original Auction proceeding and found, to my great surprise, the FCC Staff had been enforcing requirements on me and other applicants which the full Commission had specifically abandoned - saying  "adjudicating... assurance of site availability... would waste the resources of the Commission and of the parties and would serve only to delay service to the public".

For the last nine years the Commission Staff had been wasting its and my resources adjudicating this issue, and delaying my ability to build W250BA. I have now filed an Application for Review by the full Commission.  See: https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Attachment/getattachment.jsp?appn=101553700&qnum=5000©num=1&exhcnum=1  

In response to the full Commission's Order in the Auction proceeding,  the FCC Staff took the checkbox off the form, but wrote the instructions for Form 301 and 349 (construction permit applications) to erroneously state that the requirements were still in place for  site assurance;  there was just no longer a question.

Problems for an FM Translator applicant brings glee in some circles.  However,  misinterpreting the FCC Order causes a much wider problem because the error effects all broadcast station auction applications. There may have been dozens of cases mistakenly argued on assurance of site availability, such as the FM Auction cases of  Able Radio Corporation case in Tonopah, AZ and Christopher Falletti at Phillipsburg, KS.

Assurance of site availability issue is not the only non-regulation I discovered. In this same Order the Commission removed financial qualification from the auction application processing table as well.

Instructions for the FCC forms 349 and 301 insist that site assurance and financial qualifications of applicants remain an issue. People who don't like an application have filed petitions against auction applicants using these non-regulations, hoping that the applicant's legal costs will cause them to give up, or perhaps that because most applicants only respond to the points raised in the petitions, that the FCC Staff may dismiss the application. 

When the Federal Communications Commission deregulates something, it should actually be deregulated and not made into a shadow requirement with vague and changing parameters.  I should have researched the underlying Order earlier and seen that I was merely chasing shadows.  That no one else saw it in all this time at least makes me feel less foolish.

Edward (Ted) Schober is a Consulting Engineer at Radiotechniques Engineering in New Jersey and can be reached at ted@radiotechniques.com

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, February 28, 2013

(AUDIO) Radio's Challenge Is In The Home

2-27-13

Larry Rosin (pictured) and Megan Lazovick of Edison Research presented detailed information about the Country radio listener at CRS yesterday in an "Ethnographic Study." Lazovick went out across the country and spent days with listeners, observing how they consume music and what the country music format means to them. In addition to reinforcing the fact that Country music songs make an emotional connection with the listener, Edison uncovered more details about how consumers take in their audio entertainment. And, it's all about the path of least resistance. If consumers are in their automobiles, the radio is a very easy selection. If they are in their homes however, radio is facing many more challenges. Listen to our interview with Rosin and Lazovick about this project HERE.

According to CRS Executive Director Bill Mayne, ?Their results yielded from this highly personal and rarely used ethnographic methodology exposes countinued challenges for country radio in the coming years. We are optimistic that the points brought to light in this study will yield considerable discussion in radio circles in the months ahead.?

Among the study?s key findings were:
- Radio?s competition is no longer only between stations. The fight today is against all of the other media: Television(outlets like CMT/GAC/TCN), YouTube, Pandora, and even personal mobile devices.
- People are choosing to listen to the device that presents the path of least resistance.  In the car, that remains radio.  At home or in the workplace, there is a much more competitive situation: television, in particular, at home and the Internet at work.
- If one listens to radio today, it is often devoid of emotion.  And yet when you talk to people in their homes, they place the emphasis on the emotions that country music elicits.
- One of the challenges that Radio faces is the fact that country fans don?t spontaneously equate country music strictly to country radio like the used to. This poses a challenge to radio provide talented DJs/hosts to guide the listeners in a more personal manner.
Rosin says, ?For all of these nearly 40 years of radio research, we have concentrated largely on the hard facts of research, and the easily quantifiable ? answering questions like: what portion of the audience likes this song?  What portion of the audience works in an office? But while we call people on the phone, or now contact them on the Internet, or bring them to hotel ballrooms for auditorium music tests or to focus group facilities, there is one place that our research hasn?t gone to ? and that?s straight to the homes of our listeners.  And while there in the homes we found an entire line of inquiry we largely hadn?t explored the emotions underneath our work and the real connections that people have to country music and country radio. Radio remains most people?s primary way to interact with the Country Music they love.?

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Deezer Aims To Challenge Spotify In The U.S.

Another Music Streamer Eyeing The States


It looks like another music streaming company wants to compete against SPOTIFY in the U.S. -- even though SPOTIFY has yet to earn a profit here. CNET reports that international streaming service DEEZER is looking to set up shop in the STATES.


CEO AXEL DAUCHEZ told the WALL STREET JOURNAL that his company is "looking for a partner in the U.S." that would allow it to gain access to a "significant volume of subscribers." Currently, DEEZER three million paying subscribers, compared to SPOTIFY's five million, with one million of them residing in the U.S.


DEEZER's service, available in 160 countries, offers two free hours of ad-supported music streaming, but also has monthly plans ranging in price from $9 to $12 a month for those who want to stream music to their mobile devices.


« see more Net News


View the original article here

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Apple To Challenge Pandora In 2013.

10-25-2012

That's the update via Bloomberg, which seems to have the inside scoop on all the details. Apple is developing an online music service to challenge Pandora and apparently is trying to cut a deal with labels that gives them early access to new music. Bloomberg says Vivendi, Universal, Warner, and Sony all visited Apple's home office to see what the company was up to with its planned service and discussions are focusing on how to share revenue.

According to Bloomberg, in addition to an upfront fee, record companies are seeking a percentage of ad sales and the ability to insert their own commercials for artists. Apple sees the service as a way to grow its iAd mobile advertising platform, and is exploring ways to integrate iAd with iTunes to steer customers back to iTunes, according to the report. Apple has more than 400 million iTunes accounts.

Read the full Bloomberg story HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

(AUDIO) Oxley Knows The News Challenge

7-17-2012

There are a handful of operators who execute well-run, highly profitable, all-news operations. None are better than Joel Oxley at WTOP in Washington, D.C. Having had the number one billing radio station for two years running and, with Jim Farley and company, always evolving his product to please the fickle habits of the consumer (not to mention that pesky meter) Oxley could be considered THE expert on the news product right now. We tracked Oxley down Tuesday to ask him about the challenges of launching and operating an all-news station and what went wrong in Chicago. Here's our quick interview with WTOP GM Joel Oxley

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, February 27, 2012

Political Comps From 2010 A Challenge For Journal

2-23-2012

The 4th quarter of 2010 was a strong year for political advertising. The 4th quarter of 2011, not so much. That took its toll on Journal, however, the company was still able to show revenue growth from its 33 radio stations. In Q4 radio revenue at Journal increased 2.3% to $19.3 million from $18.9 million. Radio political and issue advertising revenue in Q4 of 2011 was $100,000 compared to $700,000 in 2010. Excluding political and issue advertising, radio revenue increased 5.5%.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here