Google Search

eobot

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

The Challenge Of Selling Spots & Digital In A Digital World

9-17-2014

By Jeff Schmidt

Imagine if Erica Farber stood in front of the radio station owners at this year?s Radio Show and asked for their help and support to eliminate ratings fraud. Imagine if the Wall Street Journal published a report saying that somewhere between 36 and 50 percent of diaries or PPMs are frauds ? not actually humans listening, but machines manipulating the system. If any of that happened, all hell would break loose. Thankfully, the radio industry is better than that.

That is not going to happen.
This is. The Wall Street Journal, March 23, 2014, headline: ?A ?Crisis? in Online Ads: One-Third of Traffic Is Bogus.? Subtitle: ?As Digital Advertising Climbs Toward $50 Billion This Year, Marketers Battle Fraudulent Visitors.? The article goes on to say that billions of dollars are flowing into online advertising, even as marketers are confronting an uncomfortable reality: rampant fraud. According to the WSJ, the market for online ads is expected to cross $50 billion this year. The clear implication ? which isn?t stated explicitly, but also never refuted ? is that online advertisers are being collectively defrauded of $18 billion.

Interactive Advertising Bureau Chairman and Ziff Davis CEO Vivek Shah called on the industry to recognize the problem and clean up its act. ?The industry will never realize its potential if it doesn?t take the matter seriously and fix it now,? Shah said.

Shah cast the net of blame widely, implicating not just unscrupulous actors but also publishers and agencies. ?We?ve got to stop devaluing digital media,? he told a room full of online publishers, agency executives, and ad tech vendors at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting. ?It?s simple: No more traffic fraud. Let?s end it.?

According to Shah, a full 36 percent of all Web traffic is nonhuman traffic. Other ad execs suggest the figure is closer to 50 percent. ?There?s nothing more damaging to our industry than fraudulent traffic,? Shah said.

Meanwhile, radio and TV stations are jumping into the digital space with both feet. Who can blame them? There is a ton of money being spent there. Do stations know what they are doing? Do sellers know what they?re selling? Or are we simply trading dollars and hurting radio by adopting digital strategies? As we embrace this platform, these are some of the questions that must be answered.

Today, the amount of money being spent on digital advertising is growing at a head-spinning pace. In 2012, it topped $102 billion worldwide. An article in Forbes magazine says this about the future of ad spending: ?Digital now commands nearly one in five ad dollars, the market researcher notes. What?s more, it?s continuing to grow at a rapid clip, forecast to stay at double-digit increases through at least 2015. This year, eMarketer reckons online ad sales will rise 15.1%, to $118.4 billion. And by 2016, digital ad spending will pass a quarter of all ad dollars.?

Compare that to the money spent on TV advertising in 2012, at $63.8 billion, and radio, at $17.6 billion, and you can understand why broadcast companies are trying to figure out digital.

In preparing to write this story, I had the pleasure of interviewing some of the best radio directors of sales in the country. Their answers were insightful and helpful, and show what successful radio people are thinking about digital these days.

Amy Leimbach is the director of sales for Alpha Media in Portland, OR.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Leimbach:
Advertisers these days are confused by those choices. We sell advertising for our business and we are supposed to understand what our competition is doing every day. Imagine what it?s like for an advertiser trying to run a business and their core competency is to be running, for example, an HVAC dealership. Their number one task of the day is to try and figure out how to get their salespeople to sell more air conditioning units right now. A lot of times advertising and marketing falls down the list. So it?s easy for them to be taken advantage of, I think. They don?t understand it, but then all they hear is, ?Oh, you gotta be in digital, you gotta be in digital,? so they tend to be confused and they buy in to the bright shiny object out there.

How important is brand strategy in the digital space?
Leimbach:
This is the biggest problem with digital: You have to have a brand before you get there. So people think they can just use digital, but once the consumer gets online, how are they supposed to decipher the right brand to go to? So you still need to have radio to build recall. Because once you?re online, you have to go, ?Oh, yeah, that?s right, I heard of Dick Hannah dealerships on the air, so I?m going to click through to that one when I?m going to make my purchase for my Kia. I?m not going to go to this one because I?ve never heard of it before.?

Spending on digital advertising is not showing any signs of letting up. Where is that money coming from?
Leimbach:
I feel like all those newspaper dollars, where we were fighting to get a piece of the market for so many years ? I mean, the poor newspaper industry, whatever, I don?t feel that sorry for them because they got their share for a long time ? but that money literally leapfrogged over us and went straight over to digital.

What do sales reps need to know about digital?
Leimbach:
I think that reps need to remember that using digital is just using one of your tools in the toolbox, and it?s helping you execute a wellthought- out campaign. It starts out on-air, and the online is one of the execution pieces of it. They need to remember that it starts on-air; it starts with a traditional brand. I think people sometimes think of the tactics first and they should think of the strategy first. To me, that?s the most important thing: Think strategically about what you?re going to do to try to accomplish your clients? goals, and then put the tactics behind it. Don?t go in with the tactics first.

How do you teach sellers the fundamentals of advertising and radio, brand marketing strategy creation, and then digital?
Leimbach:
You have to lead by example. I think that sales managers need to be out on the streets with their salespeople. I think that?s the best way for them to learn. Most sales managers were probably really talented salespeople, so if they go on more calls, they can hand-hold and walk through the process with their sellers so that the sellers feel comfortable with it. If you?re leading by example, then they end up learning it.

What?s your greatest frustration with digital?
Leimbach:
The clients seem to be so dazzled by something that they can?t even put their finger on it. [Laughs] I?ll have car dealers who, without a bat of the eye, will drop 20 grand on some shiny new object with digital. We ask them to spend 20 grand with us and it?s like extracting teeth from them sometimes.

What?s working best so far in terms of generating digital revenue for you in Portland?
Leimbach:
Adding streaming to our buys is adding the most new revenue. Then, really, the good old NTR programs that we?ve done for decades. Instead of using entry boxes and printing up little flyers, we just use digital to execute all these ideas now. We have lots of success tied to NTR dollars. I feel really good about those dollars being tied to digital because that?s how we are making the programs live.

Cory Cuddeback is the director of sales for Beasley Broadcast Group in Las Vegas.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Cuddeback:
Well, with selling digital, my sales reps aren?t real comfortable selling it, because they don?t really understand it. Obviously, what we want to do is use our existing relationships to sell our clients digital, and the sales reps are intimidated because they are afraid if they sell a digital package to an existing client, and there are any challenges with execution or results, they could damage their existing relationship and it could possibly cause them to lose a good spot-buying customer.

Are you asking them to sell digital as a standalone product or digital tied only to a traditional media schedule, such as with radio?
Cuddeback:
Both. There are a lot of clients that don?t do radio and we are trying to get in the door using our digital assets in hopes of also selling them radio time. With existing spot buyers, we are trying to incorporate different digital assets into their buy. So the plan moving forward is to start as many conversations as we can, and if we need to use digital as a wedge to get in the door, that?s what we are doing. What we are finding out is a lot of clients just want to do digital, but we are also finding clients that, once we can start establishing a relationship by talking about digital, we can start having a conversation about radio as well.

Here?s the deal: I can build a beautiful website for a client. If that client doesn?t tell people, via radio, TV, electronic media, about their beautiful website, it doesn?t really do any good. You can sell just digital, but there is no better advertising than word-of-mouth, and digital can?t create top-of-mind awareness or get a good buzz or create word-of-mouth about a business. The only way to do that is with, in my opinion, electronic media. I can?t create a jingle in the digital world and have someone remember a business through audio, through a jingle.

Where is this new digital money coming from?
Cuddeback:
It is coming from everywhere. It is coming from radio. It is coming from newspaper. It is coming from TV. That?s all people talk about now, it seems like. There is a car dealer in Vegas that moved from TV and radio and now spends 100 percent of his budget on digital. When you see things happen like that, you have to pay attention and get into that space.

How do you prevent your sellers from trading dollars?
Cuddeback:
That?s a really good question, because trading dollars from radio airtime into digital costs me money because of the hard costs of the digital products that we are selling. Although I am saving my airtime and able to sell my airtime to another client, it?s kind of a Catch-22. If I?m dealing with a radio station that has a lot of demand and typically in a sold-out situation, and that seller is trading dollars for digital, I am OK with it, because it frees airtime for me to sell to somebody else. In most cases, I don?t have a problem if they are moving off-air into digital.

You talk about salespeople being intimidated and salespeople not understanding. How do you fix that?
Cuddeback:
Well, right now, the way I am trying to fix it is to hire someone as a full-time digital director for my cluster that can show the other sellers that it is OK, they can sell this, and nothing is going to go completely and horribly wrong. The answer is really to have some of my sellers gravitate more to selling digital products and to hire someone who has been doing it for a number of years that can hold their hand and help them through the process.

What do salespeople need to do differently?
Cuddeback:
I want every salesperson that I have to be a solution provider and to be able to sell everything I have. That would be the ultimate goal, to really be a consultant and to be able to walk into a business and talk to the owner and have all of these solutions for them. That would be my ideal world, but I am not sure I want reps to be able to go into a business and say, ?Here?s radio and here is how it works. What?s going to happen when I run your radio schedule is people are going to go online and do their research. So, why don?t we help you with your website? Why don?t we help you with your search engine optimization, and do everything all at once?? In fact, we have a client now that is waiting to do radio with me until his website is right and until he has everything digitally where he needs to be, because he understands that he doesn?t want to spend a bunch of money in radio before his digital presence is correct. That?s kind of where I want my sellers to be.

Why do some people think radio doesn?t work anymore?
Cuddeback:
In today?s world, when I run a radio commercial, when it relates to getting business for that customer, guess who gets the credit? The Internet. I run a commercial, and you know how it goes. They hear 10 to 20 percent of what the message says. So they go on Google. They do the research. They find the business. They call the business. The business asks ?How did you hear about us?? and the person says, ?On the Internet.? That?s the big challenge. That, I think, is really damaging our business.

But aren?t we feeding that monster?
Cuddeback:
Yes. Because the businesses that want to find out where their customers are coming from, over the past few years, the Internet is their number one source for getting their clients. They forget that they have spent the last 10 years advertising their brand on radio. They forget that people have heard their commercial and are influenced by that commercial, enough so to go find them, search for them on the Internet, and then the Internet gets the business. In most business owners? minds, all this business is coming from the Internet ? when the fact is, it started way before the Internet.

As a manager, how do you keep track of all of that, and how do you manage your people and their level of knowledge?
Cuddeback:
It drives me absolutely crazy. You know, 20 years ago, we sold radio. That is all we sold. Now the salespeople are spinning 20 plates at one time and it is hard to focus on any one thing. There has been such a push to sell digital because of what is happening around us ? a lot of focus has left the pure radio play. That is really, really scaring me, because our eye is off our main source of revenue, which is radio. Managing the time that sellers
spend learning and selling digital versus pounding the pavement selling radio, is really scary. My boss, in fact, just the other day, asked me what percentage of our time I thought we should focus on digital. If you look at the big picture and say, ?Well, look at how much more money is being spent digitally, now surpassing radio,? you would think that a lot of your time would be spent selling digital. But then you?re putting your core business of radio in the back seat. And that really has me nervous.

Traci Northrop is director of sales for the Milwaukee Radio Group (Saga Communications) in Milwaukee.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Northrop:
Well I think digital provides two opportunities. One is often forgotten, and that is that it?s an extension of our brand. It?s a way for us to reach our listeners on a level of ?Hey we?ve got this weekend special going on,? or ?Hey, join us at this event where we are going to register you to win a Harley-Davidson.? That?s the one we often forget about because everyone is just looking at this as a revenue stream. I don?t think we?ve figured out, as an industry, how to capitalize on it, or that we completely understand it, but we just know we should. So we are all just jumping on the bandwagon right now.

How does digital fit in a well-executed marketing campaign?
Northrop:
You have to be consistent, and it has to be an extension of something that brings it all back home. Like, ?I heard about the fact that I can win this prize, this Harley- Davidson, and now I received a text showing where I can now register to win it, and then I look at the website and I can see the whole list of events of where I can go.? We use it really well, and that?s how we have to teach our clients to use it, the same way we do. Fully integrated. Not as a standalone, but as part an overall campaign.

How do you monetize it in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
First of all, we won?t sell social media for the sake of pure advertising. Like, ?You should buy a car at this particular dealership.? But if we are going to be at that dealership and it?s a station event, then we can use our social media to help bring that traffic around and use it as one of the tools to increase our success at that event. For example, we won?t sell an ad on our Facebook page saying, ?You should call these people to cater your summer picnic.? We won?t do that. We will post on Facebook that we are going to be at this particular car dealership and you can meet this personality. So it?s definitely interwoven in everything. But it?s not a standalone. Otherwise it?s kind of like a sellout.

Do broadcast companies have an advantage with digital platforms?
Northrop:
There was a report out from Twitter that something like 8 percent of their online usage, or 23 million users, are actually bots! So how do you know what you?re getting? If you?re looking for numbers, they can generate massive numbers, but are they real? I would rather sell something I can believe in. That?s a combination of radio with the right amount of digital added on, when it makes sense. People are oftentimes asking for it and they don?t know what they are asking, or it?s just that shiny new thing.

That?s why we have to value our likes and our people more, because we?re not creating fake profiles to boost the numbers. These are actually people that said, ?I love WKLH.? These aren?t bots, they are people ? real people ? real traffic. Everyone that is engaged with us on social media is a real person. That?s why we have to value it more too.

What sort of training do reps need, and how do you provide it?
Northrop:
Well Saga has an interactive digital sales support team. We receive help from a platform basis where they will send out ideas and contests. We get good support with questions on how to understand things. We have people come to the market that show us better ideas, better ways of doing things. Then our digital guy, our website guy, is actually in our building. That?s another Saga great thing; not a lot of people can walk across the hall and talk to their Web dude. Which is what we call him: our Web dude.

Are radio and TV stations making money on digital?
Northrop:
I think we?d like to think so, but we don?t take the time to stop and actually figure out how to best charge for this and then get all of us on the same page. Some of us aren?t charging for it and just handing it out, number one. Number two, some people are acting like they are charging for it but they are not actually getting more money, they?re just reclassifying it in the budget line. So we are bamboozling ourselves.

So in some cases, when it?s a condition of being on the buy, if one group relents and says, ?OK, yeah, we?ll do that,? it kind of puts the rest of the groups in a bad position. Here we are trying to value what we have and what we?ve built, literally built from one user on. We?ve built our own Facebook page and we?ve put great content on there and we engage our listeners. And you?re going to give it away for free?

So we?ve got to unite and say, ?You know it?s not worth nothing, but it?s not worth top of the rate card. Somewhere in the middle, we have to meet.?

Are there dangers to selling digital?
Northrop:
If you lose sight of the fact that radio is your main product and this is just another great way to help reach your audience to generate traffic for your client, and to make your client memorable. Then you?re losing sight of everything. Then you can just go work for a dotcom company. If you?re in radio, you have to sell radio with digital. The message is clear. Stick to the core, but digital is something that can definitely help radio be more effective for ourselves and for our clients.

What digital products are working best for you in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
Saga does a really good job of maintaining our text clubs and giving people rewards for being members and engaging the customers. We have a process. If someone wants to get out a text, it?s not an ?OK.? We go through the program director and say, ?Does this make sense to you and can we encapsulate it in the amount of characters?? Texting works reallywell, Facebook works really well. Those are the two things I?ve found get the best results when used correctly.

Is digital here to stay?
Northrop:
It?s amazing, it?s like everyone is in a panic to participate. It?s like when all the radio stations went out to buy a PT Cruiser as a station vehicle, they were all the rage. You couldn?t even get them, they were in such demand. Now I don?t see anyone excited about PT Cruisers. Digital is like the PT Cruiser, except that it?s not going to go away. But it?s part of a five-course meal. We?re just adding courses and more ability to reach and engage people to get results for advertisers and to provide content for our listeners from our brands. The more we can engage, the more loyal they will be to us.

The consensus appears to be that digital offerings of broadcast companies are first and foremost an extension of your own brands. It allows them to connect more deeply and more frequently with their audience. As a result of that connection, they allow advertisers to utilize the digital presence of the station for their own marketing strategies. Stations, in turn, have a new source of revenue beyond traditional advertising.

My first foray into selling digital, back in 2006, was clearly a case of trading dollars. I felt I needed to leverage digital with radio because nobody believed in digital at the time. I know I didn?t. Today it?s hard not to believe in digital advertising?s ability to extend an already strong campaign. We have to resist, however, making digital more than what it is. It?s a tool.

Jeff Schmidt is EVP and partner with Chris Lytle at Sparque Inc.
You can reach him at Jeff.Schmidt@Sparque.biz,
Twitter: @JeffreyASchmidt

Send me your comments directly or post them below this story.

(9/26/2014 1:03:43 PM)
Digital pricing reflects the demand and the CPM is adjusted accordingly. Certainly there is fraud, but if the results aren't there the CPM will drop...simple supply and demand.

However, we directly attribute some of our client's traffic to bots - it's the same noise we all have. A TV spot on the bar monitor...a print ad in the back of the newsstand that is returned...or an unlit billboard at night.

Great article...exciting times...

(9/26/2014 9:53:10 AM)
Best piece I've read on the topic in a while! Thank you curating these perspectives and helping me focus my own.
(9/26/2014 8:40:38 AM)
Excellent and very insightful. Always go back to the base, radio and then "add the fries" to encompass both.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, October 19, 2013

(SOCIAL) Cardinal Traits For A Radio World

10-16-2013

The St. Louis Cardinals (@Cardinals) are in the hunt for another World Series appearance and they remind us of some useful examples that  relate to our business. Full disclosure: I'm a lifelong Cardinals Fan!

1) Core Managerial Leadership and a Steady Hand

Manager Mike Matheny (@mikematheny22) is an even-tempered leader who is  supremely aware of his team's history and what they need to compete today. The team model is always fundamentally sound and the unit is well prepared for every opponent. Matheny makes it look incredibly easy, but you know his level of preparation, and what he expects from his team, are both very high. The message for radio is to emulate the Cardinals' in terms of strong core management.

2) Create a Team That Has Diverse Talent Assets

The Cardinals team benefits from many role players who aren't afraid to be available in other key roles. A starting pitcher who can be relegated to a relief pitcher, and visa versa,  has been a frequent occurrence over the years on Cardinal teams. There is a "do what it takes to win" approach that seems to permeate the organization. As we look for people to fill roles at our properties, we must be certain they have the willingness to always expand their skill set.

3) The Cardinals Keep the Plan Simple

The Cardinals don't beat teams with high-priced stars or over-the-top home run performances. They win with pitching and with timely hitting. The defense is solid and pitchers get ahead in the counts. The Cardinals don't take big chances. A mundane, simple plan for success for your radio brand can sometimes feel bland internally but frequently the less complicated approach will win. Always tweak and improve your plan but insure that it is simple and clear.

4) The Cardinals Are One of the Best at Growing Their Own Talent

Homegrown talent is a hallmark of this successful franchise. With a deep farm system and a continuous plan to teach and coach the "young guns," they are always finding the "next big star" to bring to the foreground. We must more consistently develop new talent from our bench as we plan for the future.

5) The Cardinals Have Great Respect for Their Past

Respect for great past players who toiled away to build outstanding careers should never be forgotten when thinking of a successful brand. Our business has to walk the fine line of respecting the past yet going  headfirst into the future.

Buzz Knight is the Vice President of Program Development for Greater Media and he can be reached at bknight@greatermediaboston.com. Knight was named among ?Best Programmers? by Radio Ink Magazine in 2007 and 2010. He has served on the programming subcommittee of the National Association of Broadcasters(NAB) and is currently a member of the Arbitron Radio Advisory Council and the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) COLRAM Committee.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Google Dominates Mobile Ad World

6-13-13

According to eMarketer, Google took in more than half of the $8.8 billion that advertisers worldwide spent on mobile ads in 2012. That helped Google take in nearly one-third of all digital dollars. In 2011, Facebook didn't have a penny of mobile revenue.

In 2011, the company took in half a billion dollars worldwide on mobile ads. eMarketer says Facebook is expected to increase mobile revenues in 2013 to just over $2 billion. That will give the social media company a 12.9 percent share of the global net mobile advertising market. Read more from eMarketer HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, April 27, 2013

(MANAGEMENT) Radio's Odd Couple Tackles The New World

4-26-2013

This is not a new subject. I?ve touched on it in previous writings. But, as the discussion of radio?s future ramps up, it needs further exposure: The working relationship between the sales manager and the program director must change from a perennial ?workaround? to an important ingredi?ent for radio?s success in the future.

The things I?ve seen over the years could fill dozens of psychologist?s notebooks. When I was a sales manager, I worked for a GM who actually forbade me to talk to the program director because he was afraid I might talk him into doing something that was wrong for the station. The inference was that I had no regard for the quality of the station content and the program director didn?t have the interpersonal skills to discuss things and simply say no to me. (Frankly, both inferences were probably closer to the truth than I?d have liked to admit.)

In the past, the agendas of the sales manager and the program director were allowed to be mutually exclusive. My point is this: That ?separation of church and state? doesn?t work anymore. If you don?t collaborate effectively in today?s radio environment, you will not succeed. (I?ve got a ton of other anecdotes, by the way. Like when a pro?gram director threw a stapler at me ? but I?ll save that for my column on violence in the workplace.)

Here are some thoughts that can help you navigate these tricky waters:

The ?Circle of Life? is taking on a new meaning. Radio?s content must improve in the face of the plethora of content available on other platforms. It?s not just about beating your competitor across the street anymore. Radio?s competition now is anything that steals from its usage. To compete now requires innovation and trying new things, which, in turn, requires taking risks and spending money. In order to support the drive for more competitive con?tent, radio has to monetize everything in its sales arsenal, including the experiments. So sales and programming not only support each other, they depend on each other more than ever before. What should have always been ?hand-in-hand? is now ?joined at the hip.?

Conceptual selling is more in the mix. New ideas and unique content might not generate ?numbers? in the traditional sense. In order to monetize the new content, sales managers will have to devise strategies to sell without the usual metrics and analytics. They will also have to hire sellers who have the optimum talent mix to thrive in a world that might not have as much of a ratings ?security blanket? as they?re used to. Having a sales culture that relies on solution-based, customer-driven revenue will be more and more essential as time goes on.

?Sales empathy? is the PD?s quid pro quo. As the sales team works to monetize the new con?tent, the program director needs to work with sales to help enable their efforts. This isn?t about adding units and a couple of billboards on the afternoon traffic reports. This is about finding new ways to create commercially friendly and effective environments for sales to add to their product suite, and it?s an area that?s been left underdeveloped by those who are used to a predetermined ?commercial load/clock? structure. However, as digital media broadens its commer?cial offerings beyond banner ads into mobile and social, radio needs to speed it up in order to stay relevant. The program director of today must be a part of those solutions.

A role redefinition is in order. As program directors and sales managers embrace these new demands, the way their job descriptions look needs to change as well. Giving everyone their due, the best of these folks already do much of what we?re talking about. The best program directors already aggressively direct the creative efforts of the content team and serve as ?audio brand managers? in addition to their day-to-day activities. The best sales managers have already taken on the role of team leaders for marketing solutions and the development of unique and new revenue streams. What has to happen is that the exceptional level of performance exhibited by the best today becomes the norm tomorrow.

For GMs: Good And Bad News

And the good and bad news are the same: You are accountable for making this happen. Coaching, per?suading, explaining, and teaching, the fun part of your job, will be essential for this to happen. Conversely, it might be necessary to let the people in the program director?s and sales manager?s chairs grow and wake up to the new reality.

There are a couple of caveats that I will leave you with. First, this is all much easier said (or written about) than done. This is uncharted territory, and the programmers and sellers of tomorrow will be the pioneers of radio?s future. That said, apologizing for asking for drastic measures to ensure the future is getting real old, at least for me. Second, none of this can occur without the support of your top management and ownership. If they?re not on board with this, perhaps you should consider not being on board with them.

Good luck ? and watch out for flying staplers.

Marc Morgan is the former SVP and chief revenue officer for Cox Media Group; he retired in 2011. He can be reached at marc@marcmorganconsulting.com.



View the original article here

Sunday, May 6, 2012

The Best of The Best in The Digital World.

Rewarding the best in the digital world is nearly complete. You submitted the nominations, our judges did their homework and the finalists have been selected for the 2012 Radio Ink Digital Awards. It's time to recognize and reward the people, stations, and companies that drive the industry in new media. All the winners will be announced at Convergence 12, to be held June 4-5 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Silicon Valley.

Our digital awards are sponsored by Presslaff Media.

Best Brand Extension Through Streaming
WTOP.com
Hubbard Radio
Multiplatform streaming

Valerie Smaldone & Jared Lapin
WOR/New York
Buckley Radio
Valerie's New York podcast

WBAB/Nassau-Suffolk
Cox Media
Van Halen Day

American Top 40 with Ryan Seacrest
Premiere Radio Networks

JimRome.com
Premiere Radio Networks

Pirate Radio of the Treasure Coast
(Internet-only)
Multiplatform streaming

Federated Media/Mishawaka, IN
Fed Interactive
Power Michiana Hits & Hip-Hop

WBYT/Mishiwaka, IN
Federated Media
Main Channel Marina Virtual Boat Show

Best Client-Focused Digital Solution

WLNK/Charlotte
Greater Media
131 Main restaurants interactive campaign

Greater Media/Detroit
Henry Ford's Driving America

WPOW & WKIS/Miami
Beasley Broadcast Group
My Brandsmart on-air/online campaign


Absolute Radio/London, UK
Absolute Radio Network
Instream Targeted Advertising


Best Radio App

CBS Local Digital Media
CBS Corp.
YourDay iPad app

WSM-AM/Nashville
Grand Ole Opry
WSM App

KSOS-FM/Las Vegas
Faith Communications
SOS Radio App

WLUP/Chicago
Merlin Media
Loop Live Concert App

Absolute Radio/London
Absolute Radio Network
'80s Remixer Mobile App


Best Use of Social Media

KAJA-FM/San Antonio
Clear Channel Media and Entertainment

WBLI/Nassau-Suffolk
Cox Media Group

KRMG-AM & FM/Tulsa
Cox Media Group

CBS Local Digital Media
CBS Corp.

KPWR-FM/Los Angeles
Emmis Communications

KTMY/Minneapolis
Hubbard Radio
Fan of the Week

Most Original Database/Digital Marketing Campaign

WDNB/Jeffersonville, NY
Bold Gold Media
Brad Paisley concert promotion

Absolute Radio/London
Absolute Radio Network
Live Scores Football Data

Beasley/Miami
SouthFloridaHighSchoolSports.com

RadioLoyalty Inc.
Lenco Media

Cox Media Group/Orlando
Salute to Hometown Heroes

Best Radio Station Website (Markets 1-100)
CBS/New York
www.cbsnewyork.com

HealthRadio.net
Internet-only

WPOW/Miami
Beasley Broadcast Group
www.power96.com

WOKV/Jacksonville
Cox Media Group
www.wokv.com

WDRV-FM/Chicago
Hubbard Radio
www.971TheDrive.com

WCKX-FM/Columbus, OH
Radio One
www.MyColumbusPower.com

KPWR-FM/Los Angeles
Emmis Communications
www.Power106.com

1500 ESPN Twin Cities (KSTP-AM)
Hubbard Radio
1500ESPN.com

Best Radio Station Website (Markets 101+)

WPLR/Milford, CT
Cox Media Group
www.wplr.com

WDEL/Wilmington, DE
Delmarva
www.wdel.com

WOWO-AM & FM/Mishawaka, IN
Federated Media
www.wowo.com

WMSR-AM/Manchester, TN
Coffee County Broadcasting
www.Thunder1320.com

WBDX/Trenton, GA
Partners for Christian Media
www.j103.com

1500 ESPN Twin Cities (KSTP-AM)
Hubbard Radio
1500ESPN.com

Luminary Award
At Convergence, Radio Ink will also present the Luminary Award, to an individual with a strong track record of leadership and innovation in radio digital platforms for at least a decade.

Make sure you don't miss any of the knowledge and vision that will be shared at Convergence 12. And be there to celebrate radio's digital best at the second annual Radio Ink Digital Awards, presented at Convergence, June 4-5, at the Microsoft Silicon Valley Campus in Mountain View, CA. Click here for more information, an up-to-date agenda, and registration. Seating is limited.

Twitter: #RICV

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, April 5, 2012

MEL: "SiriusXM is The Largest Radio Company in World"

4-4-2012

In a rare interview, SiriusXM CEO Mel Karmazin sat down with Jeff Bercovici of Forbes magazine, where Karmazin not only told Bercovici Sirius is now the largest radio company in the world, he told him, ?I think I?m one of the most underpaid executives in the history of executive payment." Karmazin has earned more than $37 million since he took the job in November 2004 and may make about $125 million when he exercises stock ­options. The stock price when he took the job was $9. Right now it's about $2.

Forbes also points out the growth in the company since Karmazin took over: "Sirius had 660,000 subscribers when Karmazin signed on; today it has 22 million. Fewer than one in five new cars came equipped with a satellite radio then; now two out of three do. Sirius was bleeding at the rate of $670 million a year; this year it expects to generate free cash flow of $700 million and is closing in on $1 billion in Ebitda. Its annual revenues have zoomed from $67 million to $3 billion."

Take a look at the full article HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, October 15, 2011

And The Winner is "The Most Interesting Man In The World."

Winners for the 2011 Radio Mercury Awards were announced Tuesday evening at the 20th annual awards reception at the Sentry Center as part of the 2011 Advertising Week Conference in New York. This year?s Best of Show Award and $100,000 prize was bestowed upon EURO RSCG for the spot "Coffee" for Dos Equis. The Zimmer Radio Group also pulled out a victory for a spot called "Feeling Trapped DWI." We posted a link here so you can hear all the award-winning spots. The Subway Bedonkadonk spot is HILARIOUS.

LISTEN TO ALL THE WINNING COMMERCIALS HERE

RAB President Jeff Haley (pictured here with the winners) said "The creative work in this year?s competition demonstrates the importance of audio in and building and marketing efforts on behalf of advertisers. We?re thrilled to see the continued diversification of brands that have made their foray into radio as well as how these brands are using audio in new and innovative ways."

"The importance of shows like the Radio Mercury Awards, where we honor the best of the medium, inspires us to improve upon the craft that we love with a single focused mission of capturing imagination and creating love affairs for the brands we serve," said Susan Credle, Chief Creative Officer, Leo Burnett USA and Chief Judges for the 2011 Radio Mercury Awards. "The judges unanimously selected the Dos Equis "Coffee" spot for Best of Show as it showcases best in class creative and delivers on this mission.  As one juror said, a great audio spot is like a great song, you just want to hear it over and over again."

Below is a list of the winning spots.  

Best of Show - $100,000 Grand Prize
Coffee                                                                     
Dos Equis- Heineken USA Euro RSCG New York

Agency / Production $5,000 Prize
Standard 1
Dos Equis- Heineken USA                                        
Euro RSCG New York

Agency / Production $2,500 Prize
Missing                                                                  
Symantec Norton Internet Security                            
Leo Burnett Chicago

Radio Station Produced Winner
Feeling Trapped DWI   
Trapp and Associates   
Zimmer Radio & Marketing Group of Mid-Missouri

Integrated Radio Campaign Winner
Mayhem          
Allstate
Leo Burnett Chicago

Public Service/Awareness Winner
Choose           
Veterans Day Parade
Meyer & Wallis

Radio Campaign Winner
Storybook
GEICO 
The Martin Agency

Spanish Language Winner
Madre  
P&G / Bounty   
L?piz

Student Produced Winner
Get Tested       
University of Texas-Arlington    
UTARadio.com

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Succeeding in a PPM World

Is the radio industry destined for more music and less personality? Two things may be pushing us in that direction, the PPM and the Pandora Phenomenon (not to mention consolidation of course). Many people are saying that actual listening levels from the PPM have not been kind to talkers who have had massive shares in the past. With the extreme popularity of self-created radio stations, exactly where are we headed?

In the upcoming issue of Radio Ink with Randy Michaels on the cover, we asked a slew of talk experts for their thoughts on this topic. And, while we had their attention, we also asked them to help us give managers tips for their. Here is the first in a series of answers to the question; What makes talent great in a PPM world?

We were lucky to be able to snag Randy Lane for some insight on this topic. Lane's radio career began as a DJ in college where he became fascinated with Top 40 morning legends Rick Dees and Scott Shannon. He was having so much fun on the air (Mornings, middays and afternoons) that his parents kept asking when he was going to get serious about his career path! After ten years of too much fun on the air, Randy was hired as PD for Star 98.7/KYSR Los Angeles where he created the first successful major Modern AC, Q101/WKQX Chicago, and WRQX/Washington D.C.   He has also been a General Manager and has collected numerous industry awards including Billboard's "Consultant of the Year" for Adult Contemporary and Top 40. 

Lane launched The Randy Lane Company in 1996 with the mission of, "creating brand depth for radio stations by developing morning shows that generate ratings and revenue.? Randy created an innovative method for coaching talent that was inspired by his coaching mentor Timothy Gallwey (Inner Game of Tennis). This method focuses on asking the right questions combined with an honest and ego preserving way of giving feedback so the talent has ownership of their growth. Lane has worked with Ryan Seacrest, Jimmy Kimmel, Kidd Kraddick, Jamie & Danny Bonaduce, Billy Bush, Mancow, Roger Darren & Marilyn, Leeza Gibbons, The Bert Show, Lex & Terry, Dave Ryan, Mark & Brian, Ace & TJ, Javier Romero, Don Bleu, Paul & Young Ron, and scores of others in every format.
So we asked Lane what it takes to succeed in a PPM world. "The first thing is, if you are going to succeed as a talent, you have to be a person that is not going be concerned with what other people think about you and what you say. The most successful talents are those people who say what they think, they say what other people think, but do not usually say. We approach the development of talent, when we work with one person or a multi-cast team of players, based on what we have determined to be the Three Universal Principles of all Great Radio Shows.

1) They have to have the content. You must have Killer Content, number one.
2) HD Characters, high defintion characters. That is, that people know who you are. They know what you stand for. Then you become known for those characteristics. Being able to make an emotional connection with listeners, is really the glue that bonds the talent to the listeners.
3) Particularly in the PPM world, flawless execution. You can have great content, and engaging characters, but if it's not executed well on the air, it's not going to come out great. Those are the three primary things that we have found that go into creating a great talent or a great show, on radio.

PPM Execution:         
1.    Capture you audience?s attention first, fast and foremost. Start all content segments with a hook headline that will engage listeners within the first 10 seconds.
2.    Connect emotionally with your listeners by demonstrating authenticity.
3.    Re-engage listeners by exiting a content segment with an enticing tease that poses a question to be answered or a mystery, drama or conflict  that you will resolve.

See more about Randy Lane HERE
Subscribe to the Talk Issue of Radio Ink with Randy Michaels on the cover HERE Our digital issue is only $49.00 per year.
Reach out to Randy via e-mail HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, August 7, 2011

"We Live in a Flat World Right Now."

Saga Communications, owners of 91 stations and 5 networks in 26 markets reported net revenue of $33.1 million in Q2 compared to $32.9 million in Q2 of 2010. Saga CEO Ed Christian says his visibility is partly cloudy. "We're living in a slightly up or flat world. It's the thoughts and feelings of our country right now, not because of the dynamics of our business. Radio is a mirror of what's going on. The map is blinking yellow. There is some green  but there is no red." Christian added "we're pacing up, but that changes. We have to get used to eating a small plate restaurants. That's the way it will be the rest of the year."



View the original article here

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

More On The Changing World of Radio Ratings.

In our continuing series on Arbitron's Portable People Meter, we spoke with Randy Kabrich. Randy Kabrich has been a broadcasting consultant for over 20 years. An early critic of the PPM, Kabrich says the device has come a long way over the past 5 years and that is due to the people now in charge at Arbitron.

- What is your impression on how things have changed going from the diary to the PPM?
Clearly, the PPM roll out had a rocky start. Fortunately for Broadcasters, Arbitron was forced to change their long standing policy of simply trying to schmooze radio while cramming what they (Arbitron) wanted down Radio?s throat.  Fortunately, for the most part, the schmooze only people have left the building. I give a lot of credit to Carol Hanley and her crew for trying to be more open to change and simply not operate in a certain way because that was the Arbitron way.

Considering where we were with PPM 5 years ago, PPM is light years beyond that. Quite frankly, I doubt that would have occurred without the public spectacle that happened during the early years. Do many, myself included, wish the sample was larger and more robust? Obviously, but considering where we are today, tremendous  strides have been made.

- Do you think the listeners notice a change at all over the way programmers program?

Probably so, but not in the way I suspect most readers would suspect. Is there less unnecessary chatter on stations now? Absolutely. Yet, I have hear to have a listener say ?they sure don?t talk as much as they used to?.

Good Radio will always be good radio. The change from diary to PPM in large markets did not make bad stations all the sudden rise to the top of the rankers ? or vice versa. Arbitron has changed radio landscape (and thus programming) with their methodology for as long as I can remember. At the end of the 70s, there was a Beautiful Music station in virtually every market that, if not #1, was close to it. Surveys were 4 weeks long (instead of 12 weeks) and the screening/sampling was A LOT different. Methodology changes in 1980 literally put those stations out of business overnight.

Top 40 was in serious trouble in the early 90s. Arbitron added 50% additional sample to most markets which allowed the big cume Top 40 stations to break out of the compressed pack and again become competitive. There was a direct correlation to which markets had the added sample and how well Top 40 performed in those markets. It is no secret that ethnic focused formats and female focused formats have had a tougher time adjusting to PPM than Male focused stations. Without a doubt, that clearly goes into the equation when deciding what to air on a frequency. So 2011 is no different than 1980.

- What is your advice to programmers on how to maximize ratings for the PPM?
That?s a book unto itself, but as noted earlier, great radio will always be great radio. The short answer, make sure everything that comes out the speakers is the best it can be.

- Is the system more accurate or not?
More accurate? What is the benchmark for accuracy? Neither system is perfect. I can show you ratings from diaries where for the 15 minutes the OJ verdict was announced News/Talk stations skyrocketed to 15/20 shares during that Quarter Hour. One only has to look at 9/11/2001 and see 1010 WINS in NYC go as high as any station in the market has been in probably 30+ years, all beginning in the 8:45am Quarter Hour and building each Quarter Hour. And I remind you of how respondents were trying to find a way out of Manhattan with all transit services, bridges, tunnels etc closed down as they literally were running for their life. Yet, they seemed to fill out the diaries properly.

Does PPM record what people listen to more accurately?
-Yes and no. When it detects the encoded signal, absolutely its more accurate than the diary. However, let?s not forget the only testing we have information for showed that over 40% of the listening was not captured. One can ?assume? that all missed listening would be random and thus affecting everyone equally, however, that is just an ?assumption? which no data has ever been presented one way or the other.

The skeptic that I am,  in my personal opinion, I always believed that this system was pushed by Arbitron as it is more automated and probably allowed them to reduce their back end workforce, and thus reduce their  payroll expenses significantly in those areas (Not that radio has not had a reduction in body counts either). Luckily the new found semi-openness of Arbitron has allowed radio to get PPM from the quasi-disaster launch to a much better operational system today.

So again, both systems have their advantages. Both have their disadvantages.
Randy Kabrich can be reached via e-mail, randy@kabrich.com

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Friday, July 29, 2011

The PPM World. Is Better Than The Diary?

July 26, 2011

RadioInk.com has embarked on a new series called "living in a PPM world." Our goal is to get a feel from the radio rank-and-file about how things have changed, in their world, now that many markets have been receiving consistent electronic ratings over the antiquated written diary system. Deny it if you will, but everyone knows, and today's top story confirms, so much is dependent on ratings in our industry. The anticipation of the "new book" being released can drive General Managers and Program Directors to the gin till as they ponder the possibilities of what a bad book can do to their revenue, not to mention their jobs. Media buyers will grind you down on the numbers if it looks like you are starting to slip in any way. That's their job and there's not a whole lot you can do about it when you know a station down the street is waiting to scoop up the dollars you are willing to leave on the table.

We thought it would be interesting to ask programmers if they have changed anything now that they seem to understand how the Portable People Meter works and have been able to analyze it over a period of time. CBS RADIO Senior Vice President of Programming Gregg Strassell says just playing to PPM will not help stations in a digital world. "Stations must be loved by their listeners, no matter what the ratings methodology. Program to the audience, win their hearts and minds.  Stand for something they want, and make your station reflect those values.  It?s pretty simple. PPM programming is making our words more efficient, but the key to being a great brand now and in the future is not necessarily overtly playing to a ratings methodology.  We are asking our programmers to spend a great deal of time on the listener benefits of their radio stations, and feel that is a long-term solution to winning, and requires a lot of attention."

Van Harden is the Program Director at the legendary WHO Radio in Des Moines. Harden says legendary status means less in a PPM world. "It appears to me, in comparing PPM with the diary system, that PPM is much more of a "what have you done for me lately" system, rewarding heritage less and content more. Even though I'm at a station with incredible heritage, that's probably good, not bad. There's nothing wrong with more reasons for us to have more great content more often."

Harden adds, "I think the fact we live in a PPM world doesn't so much change things as it does emphasize what we already knew and were acting upon. We know we have to hook listeners early to keep them tuned in and engaged.  That may be one of the biggest things PPM has clearly validated.  Get to the point.  Get to the meat.  And set appointments to use the listeners you already have for even more numbers."

Jim Hicks is a retired Program Director now living in Nashville. Hicks has programmed stations in Nashville and Grand Rapids. He says the diary system was easy to corrupt. "Finding a person or two with a diary was not very difficult, as well as other tricks programmers learned along the way all focused on keeping their jobs. So many people lost their jobs based on 'ratings' that later proved to the wrong conclusion. Programmers can no longer ignore certain formats that are really having a market impact. Now the device listens. In terms of the PPM I think the industry is better off because it is hard to argue with automated listening. As soon as many of us became technically aware in the 80s we knew there had to be a better way." Hicks says with the PPM, there is greater accuracy in the information.

Harden says the industry is better off with the PPM. "Yes, I think so, even though PPM is far from perfect. It seems to be more trustworthy and there is a lot to be said for the speed of it's reporting to us. Strassell agrees radio is better off in a PPM world. "The industry needed strong actual behavior data as the media landscape has become more digital.  The ratings system had to move into a digital age.  The feedback is faster, allowing stations to experiment and see payoff quicker."

(7/26/2011 11:48:01 AM)
The problem with responding to the PPM world too quickly, as Arbitron will admit, is that there is a significant lower number of monitors out there than the number of diaries that were distributed in the same market. Sure, the data from a source is more accurate, but the pool is almost statistically meaningless to your market size. This means you can't use PPM numbers without looking at several books, which is similar to what had to be done with diaries, thereby almost negating the benefit.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, July 18, 2011

Analyzing The News/Talk Format In A PPM World

Analyzing The News/Talk Format In A PPM World

by Tara Servatius

Filling in at news talk stations across the country gives you a bird?s eye view of what is going on in radio programming in a post PPM world. As far as I can tell, there are two factions in news talk radio right now ? those to whom the last two decades have been good and those who want to generalize their programming to appeal to broader audiences. In the space of a week, I?ve had one program director ask for a politics packed show and another ask for a show that kept politics to a minimum. Both were striving for ratings success at news talk stations. Both were trying to please local audiences.

The first of news talk?s two factions accepts the fact that generally speaking, news talk radio stations that carry Rush Limbaugh do the best in the ratings. Rush?s ratings may be down a bit in the post-PPM era, but there aren?t many alternatives. These stations program around Rush, filling their days with syndicated conservative talkers and local mostly conservative talkers. Their strategy is the one much of talk radio has clung to for the last two decades -- to attract and keep as much of Rush?s audience across the day as possible. If they?ve built a local advertising base, the ratings outside Rush?s three-hour time block might not matter much to the management at these stations.

If these stations are struggling, they are held captive by the fact that with their limited budgets, they probably couldn?t do it better than Rush and a handful of partisan syndicated acts, so why try? On a limited budget, there really aren?t many other options for these stations. These stations are happy with a narrow, very focused audience. Then there is the second group. These stations often have more revenue to play with than the first group, but not always. They want to move beyond the Rush model of radio, but wouldn?t dare (yet) to actually drop Rush from their lineup, because that would equal ratings disaster. At some of these stations, the pendulum has swung so far that they are running Rush at noon but largely ignoring politics (or controversial issues in politics) on their local shows unless it is part of major national breaking news.

The radio host job descriptions for these stations are virtually indistinguishable from those for rock radio morning shows. News talk?s migration over to FM is driving some of this and it is a challenging line to walk. Sound too much like rock talk without the music and you won?t make it ? without the music. Sound too much like hyper-partisan news talk, and you?ll baffle the 50 percent of the FM audience that never tunes in to AM radio and has never heard that style of radio before. Other stations haven?t swung quite that far, scouting for balanced, entertaining shows that incorporate discussions of the news, politics, sports and pop culture equally.  Whatever their strategy, this second group is committed to broadening their product and attracting younger audiences, something news talk radio absolutely must do to continue to thrive over the next two decades as it has over the last two. You?ll hear this repeatedly on panels at radio conferences. Younger and broader.

The challenge is that no one on these radio conference panels seems to be able to define exactly what specific demographic news talk radio should now be targeting. News talk has always had a 35+, male-heavy audience. Should the industry strive to knock that down to 25+ males with younger, edgier shows? Are we willing to forfeit some older male listeners to do that? Or should the industry broaden the audience by pulling in women, too? And which women? What are their ages? Getting 35-year-old moms to listen to and enjoy the same programming a 25-year-old male would is an order so tall that it hasn?t been accomplished much since the pre-television days when families gathered around their radios at night. Or do we stick with the demographic that has been so good to us ? 35+ males -- and simply try to attract more of them with broader programming that is still tightly focused on that group but maybe less political and partisan?

Eventually the news talk industry will figure out who it wants to target, develop a formula for doing that and then find the talent to execute it. In the meantime, we are about to enter an era of vast experimentation. All of this means you really have to do your homework when filling in on a news talk station in a way you might not have had to even five years ago as the industry answers the questions ?What exactly is news talk??, ?Who exactly should we target?? and the toughest one ?What exactly is it that they want to hear??

Tara Servatius was a drivetime News/Talk host at NewsTalk 1110 WBT in Charlotte. She was recently exiled.
Reach out to her at her website www.taraservatius.com. Twitter Tara @TaraServatius Facebook

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

End of World Preacher Suffers Stroke

Harold Camping, the Oakland radio preacher whose recent doomsday prediction failed to materialize, has apparently suffered a stroke. Camping had the stroke after his radio program Thursday night. The Oakland Tribune quoted a neighbor saying Camping?s wife reported the preacher was doing well, but that his speech was slurred. Camping is 89 years old.



View the original article here