Google Search

eobot

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Ratings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ratings. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Ratings War - On The TV Side

11-14-14

This is one to keep an eye on as we know radio listeners are moving more and more to smartphone audio listening. It started out with Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman blaming Nielsen, in The New York Times, for not being able to keep up with how consumers watch TV. ?We are in a transitional moment with existing measurement services that have not caught up to the marketplace. They are trying to catch up. I am sure they will eventually catch up. In the meantime, we are not waiting for that.?

Viacom has been dealing with ratings and advertising declines. Dauman said a large portion of the viewing of Viacom networks was through mobile apps, gaming devices, and other platforms that traditional Nielsen ratings do not include. And Dauman tells The Times that about 30 percent of Viacom?s domestic advertising revenue was not dependent on Nielsen ratings, such as sales for mobile apps, personalized advertising, and sponsorships. He expects that to grow to 50 percent in three years. Read the Times article HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, July 21, 2014

The Talk Radio Ratings Disaster

7-17-14

Showing a picture of the Titanic going down, former Clear Channel Executive Daryl Parks offers up his candid opinion on why he believes the Talk Radio format is disintegrating before our very eyes. Parks has become a very vocal blogger about the radio industry, and specifically talk radio, since leaving the employment of corporate radio. In his latest he says, "The diary markets coming in are bringing little joy. And many in the talk radio industry just sit back and continue on autopilot with the same hard line conservative narrative hour after hour, ignoring the cultural disconnect that?s happened between the format and society as the once unsinkable Titanic of radio formats begins to slip below water." And, he explains the role the General Manager and PD are playing in the talk radio problem.

Candidly, Parks says, the program director of today has no say in programming decisions. "Corporations don?t want a market PD with thoughts, ideas or any clue on how to correct talk radio?s problems.  They don?t get a vote.  Many of today?s talk radio PD?s are glorified board ops, never being taught and mentored in programming, coaching talent or strategic planning.  Many have no on-air experience. They are facilitators and are rewarded for nodding along with the status quo and punished for speaking out.  They know it?s best to keep their mouths shut in order to live another day and survive the next round of RIF?s."
And, he adds, many GM's are simply facilitators. "The ones that dare defend a talk station?s unique place and heritage in their market are viewed as troublemakers.  They are given unreasonable budget demands from corporate owners which handcuff them. They have no control to increase staffs even when it makes good business sense due to competitive situations and improving economies.  They also have no control in decreasing staffs. They are told to RIF associates even when it may damage the operations they are ultimately held responsible for.  ?We make the decisions, you?re responsible.? Doesn?t seem right, does it?"

Read the entire Daryl Parks blog HERE and leave your thoughts below.

(7/17/2014 7:52:24 AM)
Most of the national hosts are one trick ponies and are very predictable. Those traits have spread to many local hosts as well. Lack of depth along with predictability are what most sharp PD's of the rock radio era tried to eliminate from their stations. Today's sharp PD's still should. In my opinion, talk radio is responsible for destroying the listener credibility radio used to enjoy. So much dis and mis information - no better than social media. I can't say I'd be sorry to see it pass.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Facebook to Help Nielsen With TV Ratings

7-17-14

As the radio industry awaits a Nielsen strategy to measure radio listeners migrating to mobile devices, The L.A. Times is reporting  Facebook users who watch TV on a cellphone or tablet will be reported back to the ratings firm. More and more TV is being viewed on-demand as consumers watch their favorite shows when they want to on whatever device they choose. The social network will scan its databases and send the age and gender of the viewer to Nielsen. And, the two companies are promising this is not going to be an invasion of privacy as some worry.

According to the L.A. Times, the information sent to Facebook is not the name of the show, but a numerical code. The data sent back to Nielsen are in aggregate so Nielsen doesn't know the identities of any of the Facebook users. Facebook won't even know what show the code stands for. But Nielsen will learn, for instance, the age and gender breakdowns of the digital audience watching "MasterChef" or "The Bachelorette." One Nielsen executive said, "It is all anonymous and privacy-protected."

There is good reason for measuring the habits of consumers on mobile. EMarketer projects digital video ad revenue is expected to expand 40% this year to $6 billion.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Nielsen: L.A. Ratings Will Stand

7-8-14

The Nielsen review of Los Angeles ratings from the past year is complete and the ratings will stand. The analysis was done after it was discovered a Univision programmer had access to at least one PPM unit and could have been manipulating the ratings. Once Univision found out, the programmer was immediately fired. A Nielsen note to clients stated, "After comparing the audience estimates without this home in the panel to those we originally published which included the household, we have decided not to reissue currency Los Angeles data for any prior report periods. We have concluded that a reissue of prior currency data would be of limited commercial benefit to customers and would result in further disruption to the marketplace."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, June 23, 2014

L.A. Ratings Problem Could Date Back A Year

6-16-14

Nielsen says it has removed the media-affiliated household from the Los Angeles ratings -- but the situation could be more damaging than originally thought. The household in the survey had been part of the PPM panel for "an extended period of time," according to Nielsen. An investigation is now underway that will have Nielsen examining data as far back as a year.

That was one of two households removed from the Los Angeles ratings; one of those households caused the much-publicized delay in the ratings. That household was not media-affilated; it was removed, Nielsen says, because "it did not meet our quality standards." Both that non-media related household and the Univision employee household have been part of the L.A. PPM panel for an extended period of time, so the damage could extend over more than just one book. Nielsen says it will conduct an impact analysis extending back over the last year and will provide the market with that analysis.

The official Nielsen release says, "The behavior of a media-affiliated household not self-reporting is a serious violation of data integrity standards." The company is planning several changes as a result of the L.A. incident, although Nielsen did not specify what those changes would be. "We will be taking a number of actions to minimize the risk of reoccurrence and ensure users of Los Angeles ratings data are adequately and prominently notified. Additionally, Nielsen will be implementing an immediate and aggressive review of our policies and procedures to protect the integrity of our panels. We will be transparent with the industry and share our plans as quickly as possible."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Univision Fires L.A. Employee Over Ratings Issue

6-16-14

It's rare that a group head makes a public statement about a fired employee. However, when the possibility of ratings tampering is the topic, it's a very big deal. Univision Radio President Jose Valle says Nielsen made contact with Univision about an employee at KSCA in L.A. who was contacted by the ratings firm. An investigation by Univision resulted in that unidentified employee's being fired."

Valle said, "We're cooperating fully with Nielsen and the MRC to ensure the industry has quality data. A radio station employee being related to a Nielsen participant seriously undermines the industry and is unacceptable. We will continue to cooperate fully and ensure the efficacy of our internal training and compliance programs, which will be ongoing across all Univision stations."

(6/16/2014 10:13:01 PM)
It would be unfortunate to lose a job because a relative accepted an invitation. If anyone should be fired, wouldn't it be the person at Nielsen who is selecting ineligible participants?
(6/16/2014 4:33:19 PM)
Seriously who cares?

The story is that ONE employee screwing around with one meter (or household) was significant enough for a entire week's delay in a monthly and reissue in the second largest market in the US.

That freak anyone out besides me?


Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, February 17, 2014

Where Are The Online Ratings For Radio?

2-13-14

As the radio industry patiently waits for a ratings company to accurately measure online and digital listening so those numbers can be combined with over-the-air numbers, the TV industry is boiling over with vendors getting into that game. The Wall Street Journal reports how Nielsen is "feeling the heat" from companies like ComScore and Rentrak to measure online viewing. ComScore says it can offer the TV industry a single metric that tells how many people watched a TV show across all platforms, including live and time-shifted TV, video-on-demand, and online streaming. Isn't that exactly what every radio station in America would love to have? Read the Journal story HERE



View the original article here

Monday, August 26, 2013

(SPORTS TALK) Teasing Equals Ratings

8-23-2013

One of the most time consuming things in preparing for my radio show each and every single day, is writing good teasers. The tease is the most important thing a radio host can do on his show because it not only carries the audience from segment to segment but it also makes the transition bridge sound smoother as you go to commercial break.

I have always believed in trying to take my audience as close to the break as possible and sometimes even trying to "trick" my listeners with hard breaks so I maximize every second of a segment to try and get as many PPM meters and repeat visitors to the show I can. I'm a huge fan of the hard break because it allows me to take my listener to the edge and through the break. Remember, we are trying to break away from all the old Arbitron habits many hosts ? and sometimes even program directors ? have to this day.

I have an issue with some stations still using music going into breaks. We have been trained our entire lives as radio listeners to listen to radio "mechanisms." When I hear music, I know it's commercial time, so I'm going to change the station and look for either another sportstalk show or find a hit song.

Another bad habit for a host to say "coming up next" or "after the break." When a listener hears that, he or she is out of there. I hate to use the word "trick" because it sounds sneaky, as in trying to trick my audience but ? but the truth is you are. The more you can maximize the segment, the more chance you have of getting better ratings.

I spend so much time every night writing teasers for my show ? they are so important to a radio host's success today vis-a-vis how you carry your audience from segment to segment. I love watching all those TV magazine shows like "Entertainment Tonight" or "E" because the writers do such a great job of trying to keep their audience using amazing teasers. "Is Travolta Gay?" or "Lindsey Lohan is going to jail?NEXT" Those are awesome teases that I love to imitate: "Is Manti Teo Gay?" or "Does the NFL want more knee injuries over head injuries now?" Since those shows do a great job at teasing, I use them as guides to formulate my teasers each day.

Get with your PD and discuss ideas for teasers. This is an area that both host and PD can work together on. With both working on this part of the show, a great relationship will develop without the host feeling the PD is trying to influence the content. Joe Maddon, the manager of the Tampa Bay Rays, told me that for him to be critical of a player's performance he has to be invested in the player with a constructive, not destructive, relationship. And that's how both will win the ratings wars in radio.

So remember....Teasing Equals Ratings!!

Footnote: My show on 640 AM SPORTS from 10 a.m.-1 p.m. here in Miami is going GREAT!

Dan Sileo, also known as "The Bonecrusher," is a sports talk show host who has worked at KGO & KNBR-WDAE and WQAM. He can be reached at Umiam93@yahoo.com and on Twitter at @dansileoshow

(8/23/2013 9:27:28 AM)
Guiding the listener into a break as you do also helps your sponsor get their message heard for at least a few seconds. If you have a writer on staff- called Creative Services Director usually,include their input in your teaser quest. A Thesaurus is a tool writers use for finding the perfect word, and available online along with the Dictionary. Happy Teasing.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, August 24, 2013

(SPORTS TALK) Teasing Equals Ratings

8-23-2013

One of the most time consuming things in preparing for my radio show each and every single day, is writing good teasers. The tease is the most important thing a radio host can do on his show because it not only carries the audience from segment to segment but it also makes the transition bridge sound smoother as you go to commercial break.

I have always believed in trying to take my audience as close to the break as possible and sometimes even trying to "trick" my listeners with hard breaks so I maximize every second of a segment to try and get as many PPM meters and repeat visitors to the show I can. I'm a huge fan of the hard break because it allows me to take my listener to the edge and through the break. Remember, we are trying to break away from all the old Arbitron habits many hosts ? and sometimes even program directors ? have to this day.

I have an issue with some stations still using music going into breaks. We have been trained our entire lives as radio listeners to listen to radio "mechanisms." When I hear music, I know it's commercial time, so I'm going to change the station and look for either another sportstalk show or find a hit song.

Another bad habit for a host to say "coming up next" or "after the break." When a listener hears that, he or she is out of there. I hate to use the word "trick" because it sounds sneaky, as in trying to trick my audience but ? but the truth is you are. The more you can maximize the segment, the more chance you have of getting better ratings.

I spend so much time every night writing teasers for my show ? they are so important to a radio host's success today vis-a-vis how you carry your audience from segment to segment. I love watching all those TV magazine shows like "Entertainment Tonight" or "E" because the writers do such a great job of trying to keep their audience using amazing teasers. "Is Travolta Gay?" or "Lindsey Lohan is going to jail?NEXT" Those are awesome teases that I love to imitate: "Is Manti Teo Gay?" or "Does the NFL want more knee injuries over head injuries now?" Since those shows do a great job at teasing, I use them as guides to formulate my teasers each day.

Get with your PD and discuss ideas for teasers. This is an area that both host and PD can work together on. With both working on this part of the show, a great relationship will develop without the host feeling the PD is trying to influence the content. Joe Maddon, the manager of the Tampa Bay Rays, told me that for him to be critical of a player's performance he has to be invested in the player with a constructive, not destructive, relationship. And that's how both will win the ratings wars in radio.

So remember....Teasing Equals Ratings!!

Footnote: My show on 640 AM SPORTS from 10 a.m.-1 p.m. here in Miami is going GREAT!

Dan Sileo, also known as "The Bonecrusher," is a sports talk show host who has worked at KGO & KNBR-WDAE and WQAM. He can be reached at Umiam93@yahoo.com and on Twitter at @dansileoshow

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Friday, June 21, 2013

Arbitron Releases Latest Network Ratings

6-17-13

The June RADAR survey period ratings are out and according to Arbitron commercials airing on 47 networks reached 71% of the population in the 25-54 demo, 70.6% of the population 18-49 and 67.8% in the 35+ demo. The sample size for June was 395,776 persons aged 12 and older. The 47 networks are operated by AURN, Crystal Media Networks, Cumulus Media Networks, Dial Global, Premiere, and United Stations.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Freedom of Speech Or Ratings Tampering?

Arbitron has sent out a notice to subscribers about a situation in Kansas City involving the website http://www.listenlonger.com/ that may have been set up to affect the ratings in May. The unidentified owners of the website are aggressively seeking PPM users so they can make an impact on ratings by contacting them. "If you know someone carrying a PPM, LET US KNOW using the form at the top-right of this page." The website tells listeners to sign up for "Get My Perks" because the station makes money off the program. Entercom stations use the Get My Perks program.

Arbitron says the website encouraged listeners to support a local station and "posted general information about ratings methodology and ratings data, and solicited information on PPM panelists." Arbitron says the website is not affiliated or endorsed by Arbitron and that Arbitron has taken substantial steps to ensure the integrity of the Kansas City PPM panel and all Arbitron audience estimates for the market.

Arbitron went on to say that, "PPM households that disclose their participation to the general public or to any unauthorized party become ineligible to participate. Such panelists? households are removed from the panel.  Arbitron monitors social media sites daily, interacts with panelists on a regular basis, and has confidential processes in place to help identify panelists who may have disclosed their participation. We have also taken special measures in light of the Kansas City website to protect the integrity of in-tab panelists included in the recently-released May 2013 Kansas City data."

Following a review of the information available, Arbitron released the May 2013 Kansas City audience estimates as scheduled.

(6/17/2013 8:16:28 PM)
Commenters still seem to think this site was in any way created by a media company or was ever designed to unethically sway ratings. Not the case. I created ListenLonger.com for educational purposes only, and asked for panelists to contact me simply to learn more about the process and teach others. There was never intent to use panelists to affect ratings.

Arbitron and a local media company completely overreacted and created a story out of nothing.

(6/17/2013 8:09:42 PM)
Commenters still seem to think this site was in any way created by a media company or was ever designed to unethically sway ratings. Not the case. I created ListenLonger.com for educational purposes only, and asked for panelists to contact me simply to learn more about the process and teach others. There was never intent to use panelists to affect ratings.

Arbitron and a local media company completely overreacted and created a story out of nothing.

(6/17/2013 1:39:45 PM)
If major markets hadn't decided to live and die by the Arbitron ratings and thus spending all their time trying to affect them in any way possible this wouldn't happen. Be careful what you wish for...you're now getting it and this will probably spread elsewhere.
(6/17/2013 10:41:25 AM)
Call me when Arbitron finds a way to really track listeners. From my point of view, the ratings system is nothing but a protection racket that's designed to give all agency business to a few large groups and to hell with the rest of us!
(6/17/2013 10:29:33 AM)
Sounds like Arbitron has better investigators than the FBI. Let's put them in charge of national security.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Does Social Engagement Equal Higher Ratings?

4-10-13

The folks at Jelli believe so. The company says it has new data that shows a direct correlation between an increase in social engagement with higher ratings. During a 13 week period, Jelli measured weekly active registered users who were using Jelli?fs online or mobile app to vote to choose the music played during live broadcasts on five different radio stations based in four cities across the United States. Here's what they found

??       Weekly social engagement for the sample stations increased 127%, and
??       Ratings (i.e., weekly cume) for those stations increased 30%.

The five radio stations measured were owned by three different radio groups and represented a range of musical formats. There was no common promotion or other connection between the stations, other than the use of the Jelli platform to enable their audiences to choose the music broadcast on air in real time.

In addition to driving ratings, Jelli also measured how the audience reacted to radio spots served when the audience was engaging with the broadcasts. When a radio spot played on the air, a synched display ad from the advertiser was presented to the listeners online and via mobile apps.

The results were:
??       0.10% to 0.15% of the weekly cume ratings base (i.e., all listeners) took some action with the advertising. This is roughly two to three times typical performance of online display advertising, and
??       1 to 3% of logged-in listeners clicked through on the display portion of the ad.

?gOur data shows that higher social engagement levels can have a direct impact on increasing overall audience size as measured by traditional ratings,?h said Mike Dougherty, Jelli?fs CEO. ?gIn addition, adding a ?efeedback loop?f to a one-way broadcast can drive measurable brand engagement with the traditional radio spots aired on these broadcasts.?h

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Friday, March 15, 2013

(RATINGS) When Does TSL Really Happen?

3-13-2013

This article addresses the paper Arbitron diary, still used in about 85 percent of Arbitron markets. PPM measurement is a different animal, but many of the observations on how people use radio apply to both.

Time spent listening is often thought of as someone listening to your station and documenting their listening as it happens. Not true! Sweeping music across the quarter-hour and other ?games? do not lengthen TSL.

The average person listens to radio approximately two hours per day and samples three different stations within a day of listening. Take that two hours and divide it by the three stations they?ve sampled, and you?ll find you have someone using your station for about 45-60 minutes a day, and not all in a row. Listeners take ?snapshots? of your programming throughout the day: a little bit in morning drive, a bit during the workday, then some more in the afternoon.

After 7 p.m., the bell shaped curve drops significantly with the 25-plus demo as they move on to TV, family, etc. You must win the 6 a.m.-7p.m. ratings to be successful. And that gets down to what benchmarks or ?triggers? you have built in to your programming to make your station memorable. Are you making hourly ?appointments? with your listeners to solidify your features and benchmarks?

Why should someone remember they spent more time with your station than the other two stations they also listened to that day? What makes you different? Is your product compelling, fun, interesting? Are your commercials well-written and -produced, to keep people tuned in? Are your jocks making appointments with the listeners for specific times throughout the day for events, features, bits? You have to get listeners used to returning to your ?store? to shop, every day.

The biggest mistake in radio programming today is overestimating product knowledge on the part of the listener. We tend to assume they know everything we do on the air ? that they know about every promo, contest, etc. That is not even close to reality! Radio is an appliance to the average listener. It is a toaster, a toilet, a microwave oven. Period. The scary thing is that people can (and some do) live their daily lives without using radio! Radio is free; you don?t have to pay $10 for Station A and $20 for Station B. So why should listeners remember what station they listened to?

Music is not a strong enough benchmark to make you No. 1. Don?t get me wrong: Music is important, but to reach your full ratings potential, there must be more to your station than just a music image or ?18 in a row.?

If we as an industry don?t start getting back to localism, fun, personality, local news and traffic ? the ?basics? that listeners tell us over and over again they want from their favorite radio station ? we are doomed to more declines in ratings and revenue.

Broadcasters tend to say, ?To hell with what they want! We know what we should be doing.? That?s the quickest route to the bottom of the ratings. When someone tunes in to your station, they have certain expectations. If you don?t meet their expectations, they will go somewhere else. If you go to McDonald?s and ask for a Big Mac, fries, and a Coke, and they say, ?Sorry, all we have is beer, ribs and sushi,? what would you do? You probably wouldn?t buy anything, and you?d probably never go back to that McDonald?s. Consistency is the key to success. Meet the listeners? expectations, and be what you say you are. Never make them guess what is on your ?menu.?

There are any number of little things that make up a No. 1 radio station: fun (in presentation and sound), community reflection and involvement, personality from jocks, localism, news and information, lifestyle information (that your P1 wants and needs to know about), contests and promotions that fit your station?s image and the listeners? lifestyle. The list goes on and on.

So here?s the answer to the question ?When does TSL really happen?? More than 75 percent of people who fill out an Arbitron diary do so between 7 and 11 p.m. When a person sits down, pen in hand, and fills out the diary, that is when TSL is really happening. In that magical moment, they are ?un-aided? in recalling what they perceive they listened to over the past 12, 24, or 48 hours. What station comes to mind first, and why does that station command top-of-mind awareness?

Ask yourself this: What did you have for lunch last Thursday? Can?t remember? Of course not. It wasn?t all that important. Right? But eating to stay alive is an important human function. If you can?t remember what you had for lunch last Thursday, why should you remember what radio station you listened to in the past 24 to 48 hours?

There is no such thing as ?quarter-hour maintenance.? Never has been, never will be. That term means someone is filling out a diary every 15 minutes, all day. No one does that. Look at your station and your product as a listener, not as a radio person. Don?t try to program your station to impress other radio people, corporate PDs, etc. Program your radio station for the diarykeepers in your market. Period.

Tom Watson is president of A.C.C. Consulting & Marketing International with clients in major U.S. markets as well as in Europe and Asia. Reach him at laxconsultant@gmail.com or 310.498.5990.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, February 28, 2013

(OPINION) What Will Happen to Radio Ratings?

by Eastlan Ratings CEO Mike Gould

Is Nielsen spending 1.26 billion dollars to buy Arbitron and improve service to their indispensable radio customers or to eliminate a potential threat to their monopolistic TV empire? Today?s Arbitron is a billion dollar company fueled primarily by revenue from radio stations.  They are poised to be swallowed by an even bigger firm to whom radio won?t even be their most important customer. 

Imagine a day this Fall when radio station owners all over America are forced to take an urgent call from their new consolidated ratings vendor letting them know their old Arbitron contract has been torn up ?and that rates are going down!  No doubt this call will come on your cell phone while you and Elvis are enjoying box seats at Game 7 of the World Series at Wrigley Field.

The long-term impact of consolidation is seldom in the best interest of those whose options are eliminated.  If you are still fortunate enough to work in a radio station everyday, consider how consolidation has changed your job.  Then consider how consolidation has impacted the overnight jock.

What about TV?  It seems a widely held belief that the PPM trumps any technology Nielsen currently uses.  Will there now be a second bite at the apple with television broadcasters given the opportunity to pay for the same PPM innovation that radio has already funded over the past decade?

It?s time for radio to speak up.  Demand that your leadership get involved now. 

Consider the past 5-8 years, in most cases; your annual payment to Arbitron has grown dramatically while the radio industry has struggled to achieve even meager growth.   This scenario is about to get worse.  Radio broadcasters win by fostering an environment that encourages competition among its vendors-especially expensive categories like ratings research.  This proposed merger would likely raise the barrier of entry and as a result, discourage any new innovation or competition.

Our company, Eastlan Ratings, has taken 14 years to amass nearly 100 markets.  We have a unique culture allowing Eastlan to grow by remaining patient and focusing only on our core competency: providing an alternative in small and medium market radio measurement.  In today?s business environment, few companies can afford this kind of slow and steady approach within such a narrow niche.

Radio is an industry with a pattern of letting others dictate its fate.  Most recently, radio stood still as the fledgling satellite radio technology re-positioned and marginalized them as ?terrestrial radio?.  Online jukebox services have be allowed to infringe on radio?s brand, too (Pandora is an useful online service but it?s not radio.).  Before that Arbitron was able to exercise their power as the industry?s most influential vendor to foist huge price increases by promising adoption of the PPM would increase radio?s revenue.  Remember ?70 is the new 100??

More than a hundred years before the American Association of Advertising Agencies hired Archibald Crossley to produce the first radio ratings, Thomas Jefferson said, ?(We) are now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit: by consolidation of power first, and then corruption, its necessary consequence.

The proposed merger would benefit Arbitron stockholders in 1.26 billion ways.  If you think the proposed merger will benefit radio broadcasters in any way, here?s hoping you and Elvis enjoy the World Series! 

Mike Gould is the President and CEO at Eastlan Ratings and can be reached by e-mail at mgould@eastlanratings.com



View the original article here

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Arbitron And Cumulus Sign New Deal For Ratings

Arbitron and Cumulus have signed a multi-year agreement for Arbitron diary and Portable People Meter radio ratings services covering all 450 Cumulus stations in the 100 Cumulus radio markets currently surveyed by Arbitron. The agreement provides Cumulus stations in 44 diary markets access to the Arbitron radio ratings service for the first time in more than three years. It also renews ratings agreements in 17 PPM markets and 39 diary markets.

In addition to diary and PPM local market ratings, the agreement also provides Cumulus with access to Arbitron software applications, Scarborough consumer profile services, and national and network radio ratings for Cumulus Media Networks. Cumulus has also agreed to collaborate with Arbitron on cross-platform services that would quantify the total impact of the Cumulus radio brand.

Arbitron CEO Sean Creamer (pictured right) said, ?We are pleased to have Cumulus once again as a subscriber to Arbitron?s radio ratings services in each of its Arbitron-measured markets. Cumulus is using multiple platforms to reach listeners and engage consumers and Arbitron has a robust suite of technologies and methodologies that we can leverage to help Cumulus demonstrate the power of its radio brand.?

Getting a Cumulus deal with the home office has been a big priority for Arbitron. Signed contracts with radio companies is, after all, Arbitron's main revenue source. For years Cumulus has been willing to sit on the sidelines until it got the deal it wanted. Cumulus has been very critical of the ratings firm, especially Cumulus Co-COO John Dickey. Of course, all of that criticism could have been a negotiating tactic leading to the announcement today.

Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey said, ?With this agreement, Arbitron and Cumulus are demonstrating a long-term commitment to collaborate for the benefit of the radio industry. We will work closely with Arbitron on its ongoing quality and service enhancement initiatives. Specifically, we look forward to participating in the development of an integrated, total radio audience service that gives broadcasters full credit for our audiences regardless of how listeners access our content.?

Arbitron recently announced it was purchased by Nielsen  for $1.3 billion and that may have put Cumulus in a better negotiating position with Arbitron. The ratings firm bags a huge customer for its new parent company. Cumulus becomes Arbitron's second-biggest customer behind Clear Channel. Cumulus has a previous relationship with Nielsen. The two companies teamed up a few years back to try to compete with Arbitron. It did not succeed and Nielsen folded that operation.



View the original article here

Saturday, December 8, 2012

(UPDATE) Cumulus/Arbitron Ratings Deal

12-5-2012

When Cumulus Regional VP Dave Crowl told a Cincinnati newspaper the corporate office was negotiating a new deal with Arbitron, it was only for the Cincinnati market. So we want to correct any misunderstanding that a corporate deal between Arbitron and Cumulus is close. It may be, but we have no knowledge of that.

(12/5/2012 8:18:21 AM)
Lemme understand this:
An organization this large is willing or needs to reluctantly pay an exhorbitant amount of money for questionable, less-than-dependable data in order to take at least something to the street. Do I get that correctly?

If so, I have to wonder if that constitutes evidence that "The Story" is not all that compelling or convincing.


Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Online Ratings Still A Work in Progress.

10-18-2012

"We have no date to provide to you today." That was the answer from Arbitron when asked when online ratings would be ready for broadcasters to combine with their over-the-air ratings. As listeners continue to migrate more to digital, listening to audio online, on tablets and on smartphones, radio salespeople are still without any consistent data to provide advertisers to show them that radio is a part of that migration and listeners are not simply moving on to other products like Pandora and Spotify and Slacker.

 "Those discussions are occurring with our customers and we are gathering the log files. We don't have any big news to report because we are doing it on a client by client basis."

The only other information Arbitron was willing to share about online ratings was that they are "definitely in the process" of coming up with a service that includes ratings from streaming. "We are working with customers to come up with a total radio audience measurement service that includes both over the air AM/FM broadcasts as well as online streaming and be able to see the pieces both individually and together in local markets, and nationally across the country. "We have been in discussion with a number of our clients to be able to capture their streaming data, their log files from their content delivery networks. Our plan is to create what we will call Alpha and Beta reports which are preliminary reports to give the client a sense of what they would see and then build those out into an ultimate service."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, September 2, 2012

(TALENT) Planning Now For Maximum Fall Ratings

8-31-2012

It?s time to look ahead, beyond tomorrow?s show, and plot out some memorable morning show content for fall ratings. Schedule a meeting with the morning show program/brand director and any other key creative personnel (marketing, imaging, music directors, for example, if they are part of your creative brain trust).

Conducting The Quarterly Planning Meeting

Like all brainstorming meetings, these meetings are easier and more productive if the attendees do some preliminary brainstorming on their own. Have everyone bring as many ideas as possible from the following categories:

-- A quest or mission idea
Tie in with a concert tour or local sports team. Campaign for a major act to make a stop in your town. Write an anthem for a local sports team and try to get them to adopt it.

-- Promotion/stunt idea
Is there a big local news story you can build a stunt around?

-- New benchmarks
Some benchmarks and games are evergreen; others run their course. Are there benchmarks you?ve been wanting to try? A new characterizing platform for a secondary player?

-- Listener party
Do you have plans to get the show out as a team to meet and mingle with listeners? It can be as big as a station Halloween club event or as small as a happy hour meet-and-greet with live cut-ins. The point is to find ways to get face time with your biggest fans.

-- Personal storylines
Take stock of each character?s personal storylines to find serial content. Is someone trying to quit smoking? Getting married? Build a story arc that listeners will get interested in.

-- Production pieces (song parody, etc.)
What big song of the summer can be transformed into a parody about a big story? What viral video or photo can you seize and make your own?

-- Something new (TV show, movie, YouTube video, book, app, game, etc.)
What show/book/movie is your show fascinated by? How can you build an entertaining benchmark around it?

-- Guests/interviews
Who can the show score an interview with? Create a wish list.

-- Heartstring Pullers
Unlike Valentine?s Day, St. Patrick?s Day, and summer holidays, the fall holidays -- Thanksgiving, Christmas, Remembrance/Veteran?s Day -- lend themselves to kindness, generosity and compassion. What can your show do, that fits your personality, to tie in with the general audience sentiment of taking care of other people in your community?

If each meeting participant brings in at least five ideas, think about the starting list you?ll have! Pare down the list to the best ideas -- ideas that will help you either strategically in building your brand, tactically in getting more listening occasions, or both -- and get serious delegating responsibilities and setting deadlines to hold one another accountable.

Having some major anchor points solidified on a show?s content calendar well in advance makes it much easier and natural to push forward momentum from show to show once the rating period starts.

Angela Perelli is a SVP at the The Randy Lane Company (www.randylane.net). She can be reached at angela@randylane.net  www.facebook.com/TheRandyLaneCompany  www.twitter.com/TheRandyLaneCo

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, August 6, 2012

Despite No Ratings Liggins Not Giving up on All-News

8-2-2012

Radio One spent $72 Million on KROI-FM in Houston and the Gospel format just wasn't cutting the mustard. Before the flip to all-news, the Gospel station was generating $4 Million in revenue and $2 million in cash flow and according to Liggins, "that's an awful use of that kind of investment." So, late last year Radio One flipped the format to the very expensive all-news format, but the ratings have not materialized as of yet. Despite the low ratings, Liggins told investors and analysts yesterday the all-news format is here to stay in Houston.

Liggins says he's committed to the all-news format. "I still believe the #6 market can sustain one all-news format." Despite having only a 1 share, Liggins says revenue at the station is increasing. "We are increasing revenue nicely and we continue to market the station." And, Liggins says he's hoping the station can produce 4-5 million in cash flow rather than the $2 Million in cash flow it was producing with a Gospel format.

(8/3/2012 12:53:59 PM)
I'm sympathetic to a broadcaster that wants to bring a high-quality-if-done-properly format like all-news to a city (cf: WEMP-FM, NYC). But KROI is the latest iteration of a station operating on the frequency that was once the commercial classical-music station in Houston. From time to time, I perused its playlist and it provided a better repertoire of the genre than some other classical outlets in Boston,SF and DC. Other FMs that abandoned classical didn't do all that well either.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Arbitron Quiet About Online Ratings

7-20-2012

It was a topic of discussion on the Arbitron earnings conference call yesterday but not much was revealed about any ratings service that accurately reflects online audio listening. Yes, they are working on it. Yes, customers want it. No, we do not have a date when such a service is going to be available. That pretty much sums up what Arbitron executives wanted to publicly reveal about an online ratings service.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here