Google Search

eobot

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Could. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Could. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Meyer: "We Could Not Monetize Piolin."

2-5-15

The popular Hispanic morning star, who's since returned successfully to radio, spent less than a year with SiriusXM. When asked about the company's programming for the Hispanic audience, CEO James Meyer said, "We thought Piolin would be something we could monetize. It didn't work. He's a great talent for free radio but people weren't willing to pay for it." Piolin says his experience at SiriusXM was great but he had too many offers to come back to radio, which he loves, and decided that's where he wanted to be. Since his return to radio this year, Piolin is already heard on over 40 stations.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

New iPhone Could Move More Ad Revenue To Mobile

9-2-14

There's a lot of ad money moving over to the mobile space with many forecasters predicting that will continue as the technology improves. There's certainly no sign that consumers plan to spend less time with their mobile devices any time soon. Marketers are betting on a better user experience for ads, according to an article in AdWeek, when the new iPhone 6 is released September 9. Leaked images show a larger screen than any current model, 4.7 inches and 5.5 inches. AdWeek says the change comes just as mobile ad leaders like Facebook and Twitter are selling more rich media, video, and in-feed promos. Managing partner at MEC Gian LaVecchia agrees. ?Folks gravitate to the larger screen, and some think ?banner ad,? but that?s outdated thinking. We?re seeing programming delivered through mobile feeds. And there?s going to be a new richness to the canvas.?

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, June 23, 2014

L.A. Ratings Problem Could Date Back A Year

6-16-14

Nielsen says it has removed the media-affiliated household from the Los Angeles ratings -- but the situation could be more damaging than originally thought. The household in the survey had been part of the PPM panel for "an extended period of time," according to Nielsen. An investigation is now underway that will have Nielsen examining data as far back as a year.

That was one of two households removed from the Los Angeles ratings; one of those households caused the much-publicized delay in the ratings. That household was not media-affilated; it was removed, Nielsen says, because "it did not meet our quality standards." Both that non-media related household and the Univision employee household have been part of the L.A. PPM panel for an extended period of time, so the damage could extend over more than just one book. Nielsen says it will conduct an impact analysis extending back over the last year and will provide the market with that analysis.

The official Nielsen release says, "The behavior of a media-affiliated household not self-reporting is a serious violation of data integrity standards." The company is planning several changes as a result of the L.A. incident, although Nielsen did not specify what those changes would be. "We will be taking a number of actions to minimize the risk of reoccurrence and ensure users of Los Angeles ratings data are adequately and prominently notified. Additionally, Nielsen will be implementing an immediate and aggressive review of our policies and procedures to protect the integrity of our panels. We will be transparent with the industry and share our plans as quickly as possible."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Walters, Others Say it Could Have Been Better

11-1-13

Cromwell CEO Bud Walters did not have as much praise for the NPRM as Downs did. He said it asks many good questions but it will take years before the first FM translator will be granted, no matter the good intentions Of the FCC. "Many of these same questions were asked by AM licensees in 1988 during 80 90 proceedings. The only thing that can now help AM Broadcasters who want a translator is the approval of the Tell City waiver. I am sorry that we so far have not made the case well enough. The Tell City waiver would allow AM broadcasters to move FM translators and Walters has been waiting on a ruling for his request for over a year. Read more on that HERE

Broadcast Attorney John Garziglia Calls this a good first step:
"The NPRM?s most important element is the recognition that for the near term, providing for the availability of FM translators for AM stations is most important.  It is unfortunate, however, that the FCC failed to recognize that allowing for the move of existing FM translators to where they can better serve AM stations is a marketplace approach that would provide far more certainty to struggling AM operators than does only the NPRM approach of opening a future new filing window that is likely to take years to bear results."

"AM stations that are hoping for the prospect of a free FM translator may find that when they are finally allowed to file the one application on the one channel in the one-time window, there may be other mutually-exclusive applications filed for that same channel.  Rather than a free FM translator, the AM station may find that it has only ended up in an auction with the prospect of significant expense and more delay.  But for some AM stations, the proposed one-time window will likely yield an FM translator."

"If the FCC had removed its procedural barriers to allow for greater flexibility in moving FM translators, it would have gone a long way to helping AM stations now rather than months or years later.  There are hundreds of FM translators now cluttering the FM band that will inevitably be used as repeaters for distant stations that could otherwise have been used by AM broadcasters if procedural barriers to moving translators had been relaxed.  Instead, with the FCC?s proposal to eliminate current flexibility in moving FM translators, it appears as if the FCC is going out of its way to make it more difficult for AM stations to obtain FM translators for reasons that are not readily apparent."

Mark Douglas Haden tells Radio Ink, "I would hope that the commission would narrow the choices, and do a better job of choosing a standard as opposed to how AM stereo was handled."

"In this age, there is not a need for clear channel stations. If the whole idea is to serve the local community, why have a signal come in from a faraway market? Yes, I remember how cool it was to listen to those out of market signals as a youth, but there were fewer choices then. That thrill is gone. Have the clear channels power down so the other stations can power up. If there is a national emergency, those out of market signals will not tell the listener what he needs to know in his particular area. Also on that note, why daytime only stations? Every AM signal should be full service, full time.  Skywave interference could be allayed with a logical placement of frequencies, far enough apart to prevent such interference. That would solve daytime signal problems and nighttime signal problems. Assign daytimers an FM frequency and take daytimers off the air, or keep them on with the powering down of the clear channel stations."

"Fish or cut bait on the digital broadcasts. As in the digitizing of television, and the mandate to manufacturers, similar actions can be made regarding radio. Manufacturers seem to not consider AM when it comes to fidelity. From what I have read, IBOC may not be the best way to go. There have been success stories, and ones not so successful.  Create a digital standard. Mandate that manufacturers adhere to a fidelity standard. Make those standards uniform. The marketplace concept did not work with AM stereo. Give the public time to adjust, as was done with television."

"Giving FM frequencies to AM stations to fill in the gap sounds good in one sense, but it does not fix the AM problem. If an FM frequency is available with the same programming that is on the AM, and it covers the same area, why would one listen to the AM without a fidelity improvement? That does not fix the problem of AM. If the FM just continues the programming of a daytimer at night, get rid of the daytimer and assign an FM frequency instead.  Fix the fidelity problem, the interference problem, the coverage problem and the daytime only problem, and people will listen to AM again...or an FM replacement."

"I know that it comes down to the bottom line for many broadcasters. It always has and always will, but if the commission is serious about saving AM, maybe they need to erase the board and start afresh. Whatever method is chosen, I would hope that the commission would use the KISS method. Keep it simple stupid. Do not have a potpourri."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Saturday, October 12, 2013

NextRadio Could Bring in Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars

10-10-13

That's the prediction from the Emmis CEO regarding NextRadio. However, that's unlikely to happen unless radio stations across the country upgrade the app and provide the kind of interactivity consumers now get with Internet pure plays like Pandora. And with yesterday's news about mobile revenue growth from the IAB, why wouldn't stations want a piece of that growing pie?

Smulyan says, "This has a chance to be a major new revenue component for the radio industry. By having the interactivity, by having location-based coupons and other services, we could be talking about hundreds of millions of dollars of brand new revenue coming into the American radio industry."

Smulyan says Sprint has called this a "rolling thunder launch." They love the product. The launch is still early. And, to get those advertising dollars, in addition to stations getting interactive, more phones need to be in the hands of the consumer. Smulyan says when they see it, they love it, adding that one year after launch, 10 million phones will be in circulation. The goal is 300 million. "This is a daunting task. We start at zero and we want to march toward 300 million phones. The advertising componenet won't start for a while. We need to get enough phones in circulation."

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, September 26, 2013

WSJ: Arbitron/Nielsen Deal Could Be Approved Friday

9-19-13

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the company's $1.3 billion acquisition of Arbitron could get approval from the Federal Trade Commission Friday. The Journal says the approval would "likely come with conditions including one to ensure Arbitron continues a measurement initiative with comScore." The original deal was announced in December of 2012. Arbitron shareholders approved the deal back in April. It's been stuck at the FTC waiting regulatory approval.

Read the story here.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

(SALES) Could Your Team Pull This Off?

4-22-2013

Recently, on a visit to a media company where I consult, the sales manager and I decided to conduct an interactive sales training with a twist. The goal was in-depth training in several specific areas. The training method that I am about to describe cannot be pulled off by every sales team, but the benefits are worth the effort for those who can achieve it.

I have always been an advocate of bringing in existing clients to a media company to visit the sales department, so the client can share the specifics of their business. They can teach the sales department about how their company operates, plus the language and key elements of their business. Many sales managers utilize this technique to train their sales forces with great success. What about a different spin on the client visit for the sales force?
I asked the manager to identify three accounts that were current buying customers. I asked her to contact the economic decision-maker (the one who makes the decisions and works directly with the reps) at each of these three accounts. The sales manager identified three distinct customers. One was a heating and air conditioning company. The others were a satellite dealer and a women?s fashion clothing retailer.

The clients were notified about three days in advance. The spin on the client visit was that the reps would do live role plays with the clients in various skill areas where the reps needed improvement. The three training areas included a physical in-store survey to gather information and setting up an appointment by calling the client on the phone. The second role play was a first call Customer Marketing Profile (CMP). The rep was required to spend 20 minutes learning more about the customer?s business in order to find the opportunities to return with a marketing proposal for the business. The final role play was a closing presentation where the rep presented the closing template and a spec creative campaign. Note: The spec campaign had been previously created due to time limitations.

The sales training lasted for three hours. The reps were notified one day in advance as to the subject matter for their role play. Each client had one hour allocated. The first 10 minutes were used to introduce the rep?s call objective since the client was not given advance notice. The actual role play was the next 20 minutes. The last 15 minutes were spent recapping the call with the clients present. At about 45 minutes, we thanked the client for coming. After the client departed, the next 10 minutes were spent discussing the call and how to improve various skill sets based on the reps' observations. The format was repeated for the next two clients.

Some unexpected and positive results occurred:

1) One rep woke up at 3 a.m. to practice her role play. Of course, this rep hates to role play. Good! Her sales are increasing.

2) Since the reps were not allowed to role play with an existing account, the exercise gave the reps, as well as the clients, a better appreciation for how seriously we take the sales function as well as how much the media company values the clients? businesses.

3) The clients LOVED it! Before I left the market, I went to each client and personally thanked them for coming on short notice. The short notice was intentional, so that the client would not stress out about the role play. In my visits to the customer, I heard some of the most amazing testimonials. I was also able to see how the skills and professionalism of the sales force had improved.

4) Practice, drill, and rehearse. The reps did great! Did they love doing the role play exercise? Probably not. However, some reps did want to show off some of their new skill sets. The only substitute for live training is ?.live training!

Some final notes: A rookie staff might not be ready to do a real client role play. The manager will have to be the judge. The timing has to be right. Of course, the reps need to have a system in place, so they are all speaking the same language. Otherwise, there is a hodgepodge of role plays, and no one understands what is trying to be accomplished.

Could your sales staff pull this off? The benefits are worth the effort. Get on the phone and dial up some clients for the next sales meeting?.now!

Sean Luce is the Head International Instructor for the Luce Performance Group and can be reached at sean@luceperformancegroup.com or visit www.luceperformancegroup.com.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Artists Could Not Sell Music Without Radio

11-30-2012

It's an issue Gordon Smith has been predicting would come back to haunt radio for years to come. As Pandora CEO Joe Kennedy tries to force government to  lower what his unregulated company pays to make his business model work successfully, the radio industry is being held upside down by its ankles so the government can shake more money out of its pockets. Here's the most chilling statement from this weeks "fairness" hearing. Democratic Representative Mel Watt said "the exemption for terrestrial radio is about 90 percent of the problem."

NAB CEO Gordon Smith disagrees with Watt and predicted on Jim Bohannon's radio program that if government slaps radio with a performance tax, it will just result in less music. All radio stations should be paying close attention to Smith and the NAB and get as involved as possible before its too late. Smith said it's just a matter of economics. If radio had to pay a performance fee on terrestrial royalty tax on music it plays over the air, a lot of stations would just go away.

Conversely, Smith says, when you look at digital radio that is streamed on digital devices, we do pay a performance tax on that. "Those radio stations that stream, they do it for brand extension and promotion. They are not making any money on that therefore that whole segment, in time, will just plateau. If there's a performance fee imposed on terrestrial radio, there will just be a whole lot less music. And there would be radio stations that would go away, or convert to talk radio. It's just a matter of economics. Rightly or wrongly, we pay a royalty to the creators of the music, not all the different bands that play the music. Their economic relationship is with the labels, with selling tickets at concerts, souvenirs and being famous and we don't charge them for that. They would not have a promotional vehicle without terrestrial radio."

As one reader at radioink.com put it, "I have no problem paying the artists performance royalties. So where do I send our rate card so I can be paid for my air time. I guess I can ask the record label reps when they call our station asking us to play this artist or that artist."

Another reader asks the question, Can any of these legislators get their head around the business model for radio? "Their comments make them seem out of touch and unable to grasp simple economics. Performance royalties are fine but performers receive promotional value and historically were partners with advertisers and radio folks in providing the mechanism for free emergency alerts, news, sports. If they pull out, and we know advertisers are pulling out - how does radio continue to provide all this for free?"

Smith said It's a tragedy what the Internet has done to the recording industry. "You see file shares where people don't pay for music. Outside of Wal-Mart you don't see places to buy music because people just get it off the Internet. A lot of people don't buy music any more. That has disrupted their business model. We maintain there is still promotional value of radio playing their music. We don't charge them for it. There's no Payola. In fact, you'd sell no music if you did not have radio. Artist after artist thanks radio for playing their music because that's how they become famous."

You can listen to the full Bohannon interview with NAB CEO Gordon Smith HERE

(11/30/2012 8:05:50 PM)
I didn't realize that Radio Ink ran humor pieces.
(11/30/2012 4:08:04 PM)
Bill Goldsmith's comment could have stopped with a period after (The Us is the only) developed country.
All of the other countries in the world have been trying to emulate the US system of broadcasting for years.
The US system has made record companies, indies, artists, publishers, composers, and songwriters many billions of dollars and rich and famous,
without any compensation to itself. Radio's FCC payola rule says radio must select music according to artistic merit. It works!!!!!!!!
(11/30/2012 3:15:40 PM)
I'll allow as to how internet streamers are getting screwed. But for radio operators to jump all over the traditional fees...
What a pack of irritating complainers.
Were they breaking crystal glasses at the poo-bah gathering with all the extremely high-pitched whining...?
(11/30/2012 3:03:29 PM)
Translation: We will continue to try and weasel out of making payments to Sound Exchange as long as we can.

Reality: Music Radio is dead without music. Pay up you cheapskates.

(11/30/2012 2:46:30 PM)
The bottom line: radio has made many artist very wealthy. I consider us a promotional outlet. The current model has worked well for radio the artist since the beginning.

I agree, Maybe we should go back and bill those who made great fortunes thanks to the promotion of their music on radio.

If every radio station stopped playing music. It would have a major impact on the music industry.

Don't bite the hand that has gave you tremendous success, and will continue to support you in the future.


Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Friday, November 9, 2012

All He Could Do Was Laugh

11-7-2012

The normally colorful Ed Christian didn't disappoint yesterday as he went to his Executive Vice President Warren Lada's toy instant excuse 8-ball after revealing to investors and analysts that Saga had a less then stellar quarter. Christian was trying to "lighten" the mood after presenting his company's seriously flat revenue numbers for July, August and September. His top three excuses for not performing for the quarter were: "My fish died, we had car trouble, and we were all on jury duty." National was down significantly for Saga and political did not deliver the revenue numbers Saga projected. Christian said, "I'm not trying to make light of this. It was very trying and I just don't know why."

It has not been a lucrative quarter for many radio companies so far this year. Television, digital, even SiriusXM seem to be getting more of a revenue bounce this year. Earlier this week, Cumulus reported a revenue decline in Q3 and blamed it on 10 stations. Both Entercom and Clear Channel reported tiny increases, for the quarter, over last year. Radio One was up 5.3% and Entravision was up 6%.  

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Opinion: "TRN Lawsuit Could Be Dismissed."

8-29-2012

After reading through the 38 page document TRN filed in United States Federal Court in Tuesday, we reached out to an attorney who specializes in anti-trust cases. Here's the opinion he offered up "It appears that the simple way to look at the allegations made is that the plaintiffs some number of years ago were seduced by defendants into having defendants' affiliate stations carry their programs and sharing advertising revenues with a promise of truthfulness and faithfulness. But, defendants thereafter also seduced others in carrying programming that now competes with plaintiffs' programming.  And as in any failed relationship, there are allegations of grievous lies and unspeakable acts."

The attorney we spoke with says, "there is a decent chance for a dismissal of the lawsuit."

"A feature of this lawsuit is the peppering of First Amendment claims within it.  A curtailment or harming of First Amendment rights is not generally possible by a private entity.  Rather, governmental actions are generally the subject of the First Amendment.  In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants "power to control the financial fate of over 100 Independent Spoken Word Syndicators, held in the hands of unelected Wall Street executives, is chilling to the First Amendment, because that concentration of power over the financial destinies of so many syndicated providers of non-music, non-sports spoken word radio programming ... forces these programmers into silence, through the fear of financial repercussions from the rep firm these Spoken Word Programming providers depend on for their very survival."  Defendants' conduct may be allegedly harmful to plaintiffs, but it does not appear by any stretch to be "chilling to the First Amendment"." 

"This complaint appears to be a disgruntled programming supplier lawsuit gussied up in grandiose claims of Sherman Act and Clayton Act violations.  Simply put, the programming supplier plaintiffs  entered into contractual relations with program syndicators and now believe that those contracts have been breached.  These observations are not to minimize the alleged harm or damage that may have accrued to the plaintiffs.  But, it will be interesting to see if the plaintiffs are able to proceed with the litigation of their Sherman Act and Clayton Act antitrust claims which are getting all the attention, or whether those claims quickly wither and die."



View the original article here

Monday, May 14, 2012

Arrest Could Be Soon in Death of April Kauffman

5-12-2012

Kauffman was 47 when she was found dead at her home from gushot wounds. She hosted a talk show on WOND-AM and was ell known in her community for helping veterans. Atlantic County Prosecutor Theodore Housel suggested Friday that an arrest was likely, though he didn't say how soon or provide any information about a possible suspect. "We have sufficient information to conduct an ongoing investigation that we believe will ultimately be successful," he said. Authorities do not believe the killing had nothing to do with her work on the radio.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, April 30, 2012

Commission Could Be at Full Strength Soon

4-30-2012

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa has agreed to lift the hold he's had on President's Obama's two FCC nominees, Republican Ajit Pai and Democrat Jessica Rosenworcel. Grassley refused to advance the nominees until he received documents regarding the FCC handling of the wireless buildout of the company LightSquare. Apparently Grassley is receiving the documents now. Since November the commission has been conducting business with only three commissioners, Chairman Julius Genachowski, Mignon Clyburn and Robert McDowell. The soonest the Senate could vote on the nominees would be May 7th.



View the original article here

Monday, February 20, 2012

KTRH Houston Talker Could Be In Trouble

2-18-2012

A Houston man has told police that conservative KTRH talker and former City Councilman Michael Berry rammed his SUV into another car outside the bar T.C.'s Show Baron Converse on January 31st. Click2Houston.com is reporting that Tuderia Bennett told Houston police that he was working as a bouncer at the front door and watched the crash happen. He told police he rushed up to the car after impact and got a good look at Berry behind the wheel. Security camera footage has been viewed of the crash. Bennett told police 'That's definitely the guy.'  For sure, 100 percent."

Bennett wrote down the license number from the car that he said caused more than $1,500 in damage to his car.  Then, when HPD officers traced that license tag to Berry, the victim said he had no doubt it was him. He said he did not know who Berry was until HPD officers told him and he viewed an online promotional photo of Berry.

Click2Houston.com reports that HPD investigators issued an internal "Significant Event Form" to notify department leaders of the former city councilman's involvement in the hit-and-run. The HPD accident report states that the SUV headed in reverse for about 70 feet on the street before colliding with the car and leaving the scene. HPD officers involved in the investigation said that the Harris County District Attorney's office has declined to file criminal hit and run charges in the case, telling officers that no one can positively identify Berry being behind the wheel for the crime. Bennett said "I'd say that's the government at work.  I mean, that's corruption at its best."

The victim told Local 2 Investigates he believes the conservative activist is trying to avoid the issue entirely because of his public stances involving gay people. "If you're going to stand up and say anti-gay things and be conservative and be Mr. Good Guy, and then when something happens that points you out and puts you in a place with the exact business that you aim to shut down, it kind of makes it seem like I need this to go away and I need it to go away quickly," said Bennett.

Read the entire story from Click2Houston.com HERE

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Monday, February 6, 2012

(ADVERTISING) - New Policy Could Net $250 Million

(by Sherman Kizart) The 4As (American Association of Advertising Agencies) Media Policy Committee is easily the most powerful group in the advertising world. This group consists of media agency CEOs and senior executives whose companies plan and place over $200 billion in measured media including Radio. The 4As Media Policy is responsible for developing and implementing best practices and policies that impact all media platforms including traditional media such as Radio and new media including digital.

Bill Koenigsberg is the Chairman of the 4As Media Policy Committee and also CEO and Founder of Horizon Media, the largest independent media and buying agency in the United States. In October of 2011, Bill Koenigsberg revealed a historic document, the new 4As Non Discrimination Policy and Complaint Review Process.

FCC Commissioners Robert McDowell and Jonathan Adelstein were very concerned about the impact of No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates on African American and Hispanic radio stations. In 2007, Both Commissioners Adelstein and McDowell asked me to lead and spearhead a dialog with the advertising industry with the purpose of finding ways to help eliminate No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates.

Over a  4 year period, I worked with 4As Media Policy Committee Chairmen including Marc Goldstein, former CEO of Group M-North America, Koenigsberg and  Nancy Hill, CEO of the 4As. What is the 4As Non Discrimination Policy and Complaint Review Process? The new 4As Non- Discrimination policy is designed to eliminate No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates from all media avails including radio avails. The goal is to have a Zero tolerance of No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates on all media buys. Unfortunately, Urban and Hispanic Radio stations continue to encounter both written and more commonly ?unwritten dictates? not to include African American and Hispanic Radio stations. The new 4As Non Discrimination Policy is designed to eliminate the practice and policy of No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates.

What?s the Complaint Review Process?  Urban and Hispanic radio and media operators often times believed there is no recourse or road-map  within the agency environment to effectively address suspected cases of No Urban and No Hispanic Dictates. Even if they suspected that to be the case, many Urban and Hispanic radio and media fear backlash from the media agency if they raised this issue.

The new 4As Complaint Review Process provides Urban and Hispanic Media companies and operators with access to the CEOs of these agencies. Secondly, as part of the Complaint Review Process, Urban and Hispanic Media companies and operators will have the issue investigated and addressed with-out any fear of retribution or backlash from the media buying organization at the agency.

4As Media Policy Committee Chairman Bill Koenigsberg , in his role as CEO of Horizon Media, was the first CEO to  sign a pledge in adopting the new 4As Non Discrimination and Complaint Review Process. Koenigsberg has successfully initated a campaign to secure CEO pledges from most of the large publicly traded media companies in adopting this new policy.

All of the major publicly traded media buying companies control over 80% of all media dollars placed on various media platforms. Update-Koenigsberg has successfully received CEO pledges from these companies. Additionally, the 4As has sent out the new 4As Non Discrimination Policy and Complaint Review Process to over 800 member agencies. This policy is making a difference and re-directing dollars rightfully to Urban and Hispanic Radio?s bottom line.

Sherman Kizart is the Managing Director of Kizart Media Partners, a radio sales and management consulting firm in Chicago. He can be reached at 312-421-4803 or via e-mail at shermankizart@att.net

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Friday, November 11, 2011

This Could Be Your Finest Hour

You may be too young to recall his name, or you may not read history books or see Tom Hanks movies, so you might not know Gene Kranz.  His is not a household name, but if you are a child of the 60s or a fan of watching men walk on the moon, you may remember that Gene Kranz?s was the heroic NASA Lead Flight Director who stood for stability and success during the ill-fated Apollo 13 moon mission of 1970. 

Even if you know Gene?s name, you are unlikely to associate it with radio general management, but his story serves as a valuable case study for today?s radio General Manager. Apollo 13 flirted with disaster from the onset of the mission.  The superstitious nature of the flight number, the last minute replacement of the Command Module pilot, the early engine shutdown moments after launch, the catastrophic explosion of Oxygen Tank 2 in the Service Module on the way to the moon, some 200,000 miles away from earth, and the ensuing difficulties of returning the astronauts safely to Earth, all nearly combined to deliver a death sentence to Jim Lovell and his crew. Historians might have memorialized the events of those days as the most serious failures of the nation to that date, had it not been for Gene Kranz and his ability to lead and motivate. 

Hundreds, maybe thousands, of people evaluated Apollo 13?s problems, generated ideas, and created solutions, including the game-saver.  The Lunar Module, Aquarius, could serve as a lifeboat to bring home Odyssey and the crew.  The planning would be intense.  The research into each phase would take on its own life.  There would be detractors.  Every piece of the execution would have to be perfect.  Sound familiar?  Thousands of minds and bodies around the world would have to work as one, but only one man could be in charge to orchestrate the rescue.  That man was Gene Kranz, an uncompromising, steely-eyed rocket man.

Gene Kranz had been chosen as the elite of the elite, not by chance or happenstance.  The most trusted agency of the United States government chose Gene because he refused to accept defeat.  Kranz did not know how to lose.  That is why every unit responsible for bringing home Lovell, Swiggert and Haise reported to this talented manager. 

As the drama unfolded, Gene?s words and actions set an important bar for today?s GM.  Kranz led by marshaling all available resources, describing the tasks at hand in detail, and then letting his team members do their jobs.  He chose simply to ?work the problem,? and for those four days of terror in the vacuum of space, Gene Kranz directed, cajoled, intimidated, and willed his team to achieve.  That is what leaders do, whether in deep space travel or terrestrial radio.  Accomplished leaders set an expectation of success.  They inspire others to do the same.  They beat the horses and they feed them oats.  They insist on winning at almost any cost.  They live by the unwritten code of risk and reward.  They thrive on it. 

Each day as a General manager, you are presented with key challenges, projects, and choices that can either make or break your business.  For the lesser gifted manager, task saturation, too many things happening at once, may set in and paralyze him.  For the more seasoned pro, the vision of an end result illuminates all of the steps between the situation at this moment and the required result. Kranz made the result clear to his group of engineers, mathematicians, and technicians in a single five-word sentence: ?Failure is not an option.? 

Do your words and actions instill that same level of commitment to work until you win?  Would your team members, both up and down the chain of command, follow you into the freezing vacuum of space, risking life and limb, knowing without reservation that they will each emerge unscathed and victorious on the other side?  Ask yourself these questions objectively, introspectively, and with extreme caution because the truth can be disturbing.

When the Apollo 13 mission began to unravel, Kranz gathered the sharpest minds at his disposal to frame the overwhelming challenges of the revised mission. He clearly and calmly explained every detail of every job to every person supporting the rescue efforts.  He cooly and steadily insisted that every task was the most important step in that moment, in that day.  And his people believed.  They accepted that success was, indeed, their only option.  They would do whatever the job required, lay on their backs for long hours in uncomfortable dark and cold spaces, risk their own reputations and those of the contractors and subcontractors they represented, and place the needs of the crew ahead of their own, because this emergency?and Kranz?demanded it.

Were Kranz?s team members afraid?  Of course they were, but thanks to Kranz?s skilled and steady approach, they believed the most important thing that any workgroup can ever believe; Success is within their grasp.  The belief that one will triumph over one?s adversary is a far stronger motivator than failure, even in the face of constantly changing events, waning resources, and declining results.  Kranz understood the value of unqualified belief in success, perhaps better than anyone at NASA that week in April. 

After the safe return of Apollo 13, Kranz summed up NASA?s character and provided today?s Radio GM with a bold lesson when he asserted in Mission Control, ?You cannot operate in this room unless you believe that you are Superman, and whatever happens, you're capable of solving the problem.?

It is time to stop some bullets, leap tall buildings at a single bound, and fly.  Yes, fly.  The lesson for today?s Radio GM, struggling at the entrance to a maze of unending change, exciting new opportunities, silly governmental restrictions and, more often than not, reduced resources, and embarrassing sales declines, is a Rule of Kranz that you break at your own peril:  If you?re going to do a job, give it your best.

?To recognize that the greatest error is not to have tried and failed, but that in trying, we did not give it our best effort,? was the Kranz credo that NASA still invokes in 2011.

Radio needs General Managers who are visionary leaders.  Are you willing to make mistakes?  You better be.  They happen and they can alter human lives in a moment?s span.  Do you have a plan to overcome negativity and all-too-often pervasive pessimism in your organization?  These common emotions are bent on snatching defeat from the grasp of your success.  Don?t let that happen.  Put on your mission vest and channel your inner Gene Kranz to obliterate chaos and negative energy, and to insure that your leadership creates something positive and useful to achieve your goals. 

Relish your role as your station?s leader, and be ready and willing to reject any notion of failure, to unequivocally pronounce, ?Not on my watch!?  

With your unfaltering dedication, all systems are ?Go? for Radio to enjoy its finest hour.

Bill Pasha is President of MultiBrand Media International, LLC and MBMI Cover America.  The companies provide hands-on business solutions to a wide scope of international and domestic media concerns and creates value for media client-partners on four continents.  Contact:  bpasha@multibrandmedia.com

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Smulyan: "We Would Have Done The Talk Format if We Could."

As the sale of three stations to Emmis became official, Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan told Radio Ink he wanted to flip to talk years ago. "It's always hard to be a seller. If you love this business, it's hard to sell. The fact we could keep a significant interest is helpful. We love the idea of this format. If our capital structure had been different we would have done that format a while ago. We believe in the format. We believe in Randy and Walter's ability to execute it, we have no doubt about it."

The sale of  WKQX-FM (Chicago), WLUP-FM (Chicago) and WRXP-FM (NY) from Emmis to Merlin Media (GTCR and Randy Michaels) is now official. Emmis gets about $120 million in cash from the sale of the stations, net of transaction expenses, and owns $28.7 million of preferred equity and 20.6% of the common equity interests in Merlin Media. The net cash proceeds were used to repay approximately 38% of the company's term loans under its senior credit facility.  Merlin has been in LMA mode since July 15, 2011. 

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here