Google Search

eobot

Search This Blog

Thursday, October 2, 2014

(DIALOGUE) ROI Through Technology

9-29-2014

Last month, 30-year broadcast and tech executive Phil Argyris was tapped to lead GatesAir, formerly part of Harris Broadcast. I asked him to share some of his vision for his company and the industry.

What are radio?s greatest tech opportunities today?

Multichannel HD Radio remains a strong opportunity for the over-the-air model. The bandwidth efficiency of the HD Radio digital stream brings not only additional channels into play, but also interactivity. Two-way streams can potentially drive audience engagement through interactive experiences and turn into revenue generation, mixing in ads and sponsor-driven messages.

Global opportunities show how well radio as an industry is thriving. The efficient use of the spectrum to deliver audio (and video in some cases) has proven successful in parts of the world where nationwide DAB networks have been deployed. These developments are significant for U.S. broadcasters, demonstrating global momentum and opportunities that exist around the transition to digital radio.

We also remain engaged in next-generation signal boosting and hyperlocal advertising strategies that drive very targeted messaging ? right down to the local neighborhood of the listener.

How does all this impact and grow radio audience and revenue?

In addition to revenue generation through emerging opportunities from ZoneCasting, HD Radio, and other digital technologies, there needs to be an ongoing cost-benefit for the station infrastructure. We?re driving innovation by optimizing existing networks, establishing paths toward digital and IP systems, and minimizing ongoing operational costs for the station.

The main point is that to make a real bottom-line impact, there needs to be cost reduction on the operational side that can drive more investment in new technologies and initiatives.

With broadcast companies today stretching the life of their assets, what creates sustainability for GatesAir?

The short answer is our focus on solving customer problems, and presenting solutions that allow them to make continued investment and drive profitability. This could be new services, the ROI for replacement equipment, or the investment in new networks across areas of the world that are just beginning to deploy digital radio. We provide a value proposition that allows the broadcaster?s top and bottom line to grow.

Our long-term sustainability is cemented through several factors: continued investment in research and development; a strong manufacturing and engineering base, along with our constant drive to innovate; and a customer-first strategy adhered to by all of our employees to build and deliver solutions that reduce long-term operational costs and accelerate return on investment for the customer. We continue to have the strongest, most dedicated sales force with a well-planned strategy and comprehensive global reach that keeps us agile.

The predecessor companies of GatesAir, Gates and Harris Broadcast, offered a vast line of products, from the antenna to the studio. Will this broad product line remain, or will GatesAir narrow its focus in some areas?

The radio business of GatesAir, like Harris Broadcast, comprises three pillars: create, transport, and transmit. Our range of studio solutions, covering networking, consoles and furniture, comprises the ?create? pillar. A wide range of IP and legacy solutions for audio contribution and distribution ? from point-to-point STL and remote contribution to multipoint IP distribution ? comprise the ?transport? side of the business. And of course our latest range of high-efficiency transmitters and software defined exciters constitute the ?transmit? pillar.

I see these solutions remaining at the core of the GatesAir business. We continue to innovate across all three of these sectors, and remain the only industry vendor able to design and deliver complete turnkey solutions for the radio broadcaster. Engineers and managers attending the Radio Show or the IBC show in Amsterdam in September can see our latest innovations in these areas.

Any thoughts on the automotive dash and what radio needs to do to maintain an integral spot?

Radio still draws and retains a significant audience, and there is still plenty happening on the AM and FM dial to persuade listeners on the road to explore what?s happening. We need to aggressively pursue building audience size and generating more advertising revenue. As an industry supplier, we can help by developing technologies and solutions that help broadcasters achieve these goals.

Our MaxxCasting solution was specifically created to help broadcasters strategically boost signal coverage across their spectrum allotments. This has the dual benefit of drawing in more listeners and advertisers from the significant increase in the broadcaster?s signal presence marketwide.

Deborah Parenti is EVP/Radio for Streamline Publishing. E-mail: parenti@aol.com.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

(SALES) Selling To Venus And Mars

9-29-2014
By Sean Luce

I stumbled across a book once that substantially helped me understand the relationships between women and men. Some from our newer generation of sales reps might not have been exposed to it. It?s called Men Are From Mars, Women Are from Venus. The author's name is John Gray, Ph.D.

I went shopping at a mall with Venus. Simply put, Venus took four hours to find what she wanted and Mars (me) spent 20 minutes to find what I needed. How does this translate to selling? If we understand that women and men look for different things in the selling process, our potential to increase the sale will be enormous.

The same communications barriers that appear in relationships between men and women in marriage might also cause barriers in a sales call between two people of the opposite sex.

The same-shoe-fits-all technique can severely hamper us by alienating prospects and customers. Our chances on the sales call can increase dramatically if we understand the characteristics that are typical of each gender. Here are a few tips to remember when selling to Venus and Mars.

Women Selling To Men:
Men want the facts and the information up front. Are they interested in developing a relationship? Absolutely. However that?s secondary in the selling equation when a woman is selling to a man. Know your prospect inside and out. How many commercials will achieve a frequency of three? How many click-throughs are they getting on their ad? This will project confidence and credibility in the sales call.

Little ways to score big points with male prospects:
?         Give him the facts and be direct.
?         He probably likes to discuss business, sports, and money.
?         He wants consistent maintenance.
?         He?ll feel insecure if you appear to know more than he does.
?         Feed his ego.
Men Selling To Women:
Women are emotional and want relationships developed before they turn over the money. Here the 80-percent rule comes into play, where 80 percent of the buy is based on whether they like you and trust you. Women should be taken seriously. Eye contact is of the essence. Don?t ever make them feel inferior through number-spouting. They want to be educated by you through sincerity and interest in their ideas.

Little ways to score big points with a female prospect:
?         Always listen with interest. Don?t look over her shoulder as if you need to speak to someone else.
?         Plan ahead with regularly scheduled business meetings.
?         Pay attention to details.
?         Offer to do helpful things without her having to ask.
?         Use handwritten notes occasionally to leave a message.
?         Follow-up, follow up, follow up.
It?s not the big things that keep selling relationships from working, it is the little things. Follow these guidelines and you?ll take out some of the mystery and frustration of selling to the other gender.

Sean Luce is the Head National Instructor for the Luce Performance Group International and can be reached at Sean@luceperformancegroup.com or www.luceperformancegroup.com. Sean?s new book The Liquid Fire can be found on Amazon.com.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

(DIGITAL) The SoundCloud Debacle

9-29-2014

The SoundCloud Debacle: The intersection between copyright holders and revenue sharing on user-generated content platforms.

By Mike Spinelli

SoundCloud?s kettle boiled over this summer when major labels (?the majors?) started to enforce their intellectual property rights, upsetting the service?s large community of producers and DJs. After seven years of maintaining the same service, SoundCloud took drastic steps to change its design, and more importantly, its functionality. Many of the functionality changes likely occurred from the growing concern of potentially copyright infringing works that inhabit the platform. Although SoundCloud has remedied the situation temporarily to satisfy the smaller artists, it will likely run into further problems down the road.

Until just a few months ago, SoundCloud was relying on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (?DMCA?) as well as its ?finger printing? technology called Audible Magic to police its content for copyright infringement. Audible Magic is severely limited in that it can only detect nearly exact copies of songs. Any further determination requires a copyright infringement analysis by the courts. Thus, most of the ?actual? policing of content stems from the major labels submitting takedown notices of tracks they believe to be infringing upon their rights. This procedure is provided under the DMCA framework. The reliance on the DMCA and Audible Magic has proven to be a safe legal position when the service is based on user-generated content.

Although this may be a legally sound position, it did not please the service?s majority of users ? producers and DJs. Many users? questionable tracks were removed through recent DMCA takedowns which angered the SoundCloud community as a whole. Well-known DJ Kaskade was able to garner support after publicly and vehemently speaking out about having a few of his tracks removed. In what was most likely an exercise in damage control and shy away from its reliance on the DMCA, SoundCloud entered into licensing deals with the majors. In exchange for percentages of ownership in the company, SoundCloud received music licensing deals from the majors. Thus, DJs and producers who are uploading potentially infringing remixes are now protected from having their work taken down.

In addition to the new licensing deals with the majors, SoundCloud recently announced an ad-based revenue sharing tier to its service. This will likely cause new issues. The tier seems to be similar to the monetization of content for YouTube users. Currently, the revenue sharing tier, dubbed ?Premier,? is by invitation only. One can only wonder which DJs and producers will be invited to Premier. From an intellectual property standpoint, the answer seems to be only DJs and producers currently signed to the majors. These artists are likely to be releasing content on the service that is properly licensed. Although SoundCloud now has licensing deals with the majors to avoid DMCA takedowns, monetization of potentially infringing material that is hosted on the service will continue to pose legal problems.

Let?s take a likely scenario and assume that superstar Drake is invited to Premier. Because of the loose atmosphere of the service, Drake (along with the majority of the user-base) use SoundCloud to post songs that aren?t on formal releases. For example, a few months ago Drake released a track entitled ?Draft Day,? featuring a pitched up Lauryn Hill sample recurring throughout the track. Because this isn?t a formally released track, it is likely that the sample isn?t cleared by the copyright owner. However, let?s assume that unauthorized used is covered under the aforementioned licenses that SoundCloud recently inked.

It?s unknown how SoundCloud will display their ads. If the ads are attributable to songs in a way that is similar to YouTube video ads, then who would receive the funds earned from questionable tracks such as ?Draft Day?? Did SoundCloud foresee this issue and work it into the aforementioned deals? Thus, any money earned would be pursuant to these licenses. How will the service decide who owns the rights in the first place? Would it allow users to claim they own all the rights to their songs and wait until the copyright owner comes around? Wouldn?t that take things back to square one and irritate the user base? Maybe SoundCloud will follow YouTube with regard to ?unofficial? uploads of songs, where the copyright owners receive the revenue and the uploader gets none. However, who are the copyright owners in a case of a potentially infringing work? It must be worked out on a case by case basis between feuding copyright holders. In addition, depending on the ubiquity of Premier, there could be a fair amount of argumentation over who owns what rights.

These are but a few issues that need to be addressed by SoundCloud. The service is running into these issues because it is trying to modify how a user-generated content service can make money. SoundCloud was originally built as a ?music collaboration hub.? The way it predominately earned money was through users purchasing accounts with more space to upload collaborative work. Since SoundCloud opened its digital doors, the focus has shifted away from collaboration and toward DJs and producers showcasing their latest tunes. The abundance of potentially infringing works on the service creates a logistical nightmare for an ad monetization model. In all likelihood, we won?t see much of SoundCloud?s user base in the revenue-sharing tier any time soon.

This guest column was contributed by Mike Spinelli, a third-year law student at Quinnipiac University School of Law, where he is studying music transactions and music licensing. He previously worked at SoundExchange. Contact Mike at mespinelli@quinnipiac.edu.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Juror: Humiliation Will Last Forever

9-29-14

Following the verdict KSHB Television in Kansas City interviewed the morning team of Afentra and Danny Boi along with a juror who said the million dollars she helped award law student Ashley Patton was not enough because her name will be associated with porn online forever. Juror Lisa Davis told the TV station "words have power so you have to be careful about what you say." The duo will be back on the air this morning after four days off for the trial. The incident took place back in April of 2012. The morning hosts were suspended for several days at that time. Danny Boi (pictured here) told the TV station, "We're being welcomed back to a job we don't necessarily deserve, but Entercom said we want you back on the air Monday. It makes you feel like you have a home.

Add a Comment Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

Smaldone And Gold Join America Weekend Lineup

9-24-14

Valerie Smaldone and Leslie Gold are now part of the new America Weekend lineup which can be heard on affiliate stations of the Envision Talk Network. Smaldone (pictured right) said, ?I am delighted to be working with the fabulous Leslie Gold as we host a weekly show together focusing on fascinating personalities and celebrities, trends, and curiosities. We look forward to having our audience laugh along with us and learn some new things while being entertained. There is nothing like good conversation and that?s what our America Weekend is all about.?

Gold added, ?America Weekend presents an opportunity to talk about the stuff that intrigues, amuses, and vexes all of us. Hosting the show with my real-life friend Valerie Smaldone makes it an immense pleasure for me. We pledge captivating talk by two veteran broadcasters who are also true friends. It should be much fun.? 

?We couldn?t be more excited to have Valerie and Leslie join the team of hosts on America Weekend,? said Michael Lichtstein, VP/programming of Envision Networks?. ?Each brings a breadth of radio experience to the show and together they set a new bar when it comes to delivering compelling and thought-provoking conversation.?



View the original article here

The Challenge Of Selling Spots & Digital In A Digital World

9-17-2014

By Jeff Schmidt

Imagine if Erica Farber stood in front of the radio station owners at this year?s Radio Show and asked for their help and support to eliminate ratings fraud. Imagine if the Wall Street Journal published a report saying that somewhere between 36 and 50 percent of diaries or PPMs are frauds ? not actually humans listening, but machines manipulating the system. If any of that happened, all hell would break loose. Thankfully, the radio industry is better than that.

That is not going to happen.
This is. The Wall Street Journal, March 23, 2014, headline: ?A ?Crisis? in Online Ads: One-Third of Traffic Is Bogus.? Subtitle: ?As Digital Advertising Climbs Toward $50 Billion This Year, Marketers Battle Fraudulent Visitors.? The article goes on to say that billions of dollars are flowing into online advertising, even as marketers are confronting an uncomfortable reality: rampant fraud. According to the WSJ, the market for online ads is expected to cross $50 billion this year. The clear implication ? which isn?t stated explicitly, but also never refuted ? is that online advertisers are being collectively defrauded of $18 billion.

Interactive Advertising Bureau Chairman and Ziff Davis CEO Vivek Shah called on the industry to recognize the problem and clean up its act. ?The industry will never realize its potential if it doesn?t take the matter seriously and fix it now,? Shah said.

Shah cast the net of blame widely, implicating not just unscrupulous actors but also publishers and agencies. ?We?ve got to stop devaluing digital media,? he told a room full of online publishers, agency executives, and ad tech vendors at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting. ?It?s simple: No more traffic fraud. Let?s end it.?

According to Shah, a full 36 percent of all Web traffic is nonhuman traffic. Other ad execs suggest the figure is closer to 50 percent. ?There?s nothing more damaging to our industry than fraudulent traffic,? Shah said.

Meanwhile, radio and TV stations are jumping into the digital space with both feet. Who can blame them? There is a ton of money being spent there. Do stations know what they are doing? Do sellers know what they?re selling? Or are we simply trading dollars and hurting radio by adopting digital strategies? As we embrace this platform, these are some of the questions that must be answered.

Today, the amount of money being spent on digital advertising is growing at a head-spinning pace. In 2012, it topped $102 billion worldwide. An article in Forbes magazine says this about the future of ad spending: ?Digital now commands nearly one in five ad dollars, the market researcher notes. What?s more, it?s continuing to grow at a rapid clip, forecast to stay at double-digit increases through at least 2015. This year, eMarketer reckons online ad sales will rise 15.1%, to $118.4 billion. And by 2016, digital ad spending will pass a quarter of all ad dollars.?

Compare that to the money spent on TV advertising in 2012, at $63.8 billion, and radio, at $17.6 billion, and you can understand why broadcast companies are trying to figure out digital.

In preparing to write this story, I had the pleasure of interviewing some of the best radio directors of sales in the country. Their answers were insightful and helpful, and show what successful radio people are thinking about digital these days.

Amy Leimbach is the director of sales for Alpha Media in Portland, OR.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Leimbach:
Advertisers these days are confused by those choices. We sell advertising for our business and we are supposed to understand what our competition is doing every day. Imagine what it?s like for an advertiser trying to run a business and their core competency is to be running, for example, an HVAC dealership. Their number one task of the day is to try and figure out how to get their salespeople to sell more air conditioning units right now. A lot of times advertising and marketing falls down the list. So it?s easy for them to be taken advantage of, I think. They don?t understand it, but then all they hear is, ?Oh, you gotta be in digital, you gotta be in digital,? so they tend to be confused and they buy in to the bright shiny object out there.

How important is brand strategy in the digital space?
Leimbach:
This is the biggest problem with digital: You have to have a brand before you get there. So people think they can just use digital, but once the consumer gets online, how are they supposed to decipher the right brand to go to? So you still need to have radio to build recall. Because once you?re online, you have to go, ?Oh, yeah, that?s right, I heard of Dick Hannah dealerships on the air, so I?m going to click through to that one when I?m going to make my purchase for my Kia. I?m not going to go to this one because I?ve never heard of it before.?

Spending on digital advertising is not showing any signs of letting up. Where is that money coming from?
Leimbach:
I feel like all those newspaper dollars, where we were fighting to get a piece of the market for so many years ? I mean, the poor newspaper industry, whatever, I don?t feel that sorry for them because they got their share for a long time ? but that money literally leapfrogged over us and went straight over to digital.

What do sales reps need to know about digital?
Leimbach:
I think that reps need to remember that using digital is just using one of your tools in the toolbox, and it?s helping you execute a wellthought- out campaign. It starts out on-air, and the online is one of the execution pieces of it. They need to remember that it starts on-air; it starts with a traditional brand. I think people sometimes think of the tactics first and they should think of the strategy first. To me, that?s the most important thing: Think strategically about what you?re going to do to try to accomplish your clients? goals, and then put the tactics behind it. Don?t go in with the tactics first.

How do you teach sellers the fundamentals of advertising and radio, brand marketing strategy creation, and then digital?
Leimbach:
You have to lead by example. I think that sales managers need to be out on the streets with their salespeople. I think that?s the best way for them to learn. Most sales managers were probably really talented salespeople, so if they go on more calls, they can hand-hold and walk through the process with their sellers so that the sellers feel comfortable with it. If you?re leading by example, then they end up learning it.

What?s your greatest frustration with digital?
Leimbach:
The clients seem to be so dazzled by something that they can?t even put their finger on it. [Laughs] I?ll have car dealers who, without a bat of the eye, will drop 20 grand on some shiny new object with digital. We ask them to spend 20 grand with us and it?s like extracting teeth from them sometimes.

What?s working best so far in terms of generating digital revenue for you in Portland?
Leimbach:
Adding streaming to our buys is adding the most new revenue. Then, really, the good old NTR programs that we?ve done for decades. Instead of using entry boxes and printing up little flyers, we just use digital to execute all these ideas now. We have lots of success tied to NTR dollars. I feel really good about those dollars being tied to digital because that?s how we are making the programs live.

Cory Cuddeback is the director of sales for Beasley Broadcast Group in Las Vegas.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Cuddeback:
Well, with selling digital, my sales reps aren?t real comfortable selling it, because they don?t really understand it. Obviously, what we want to do is use our existing relationships to sell our clients digital, and the sales reps are intimidated because they are afraid if they sell a digital package to an existing client, and there are any challenges with execution or results, they could damage their existing relationship and it could possibly cause them to lose a good spot-buying customer.

Are you asking them to sell digital as a standalone product or digital tied only to a traditional media schedule, such as with radio?
Cuddeback:
Both. There are a lot of clients that don?t do radio and we are trying to get in the door using our digital assets in hopes of also selling them radio time. With existing spot buyers, we are trying to incorporate different digital assets into their buy. So the plan moving forward is to start as many conversations as we can, and if we need to use digital as a wedge to get in the door, that?s what we are doing. What we are finding out is a lot of clients just want to do digital, but we are also finding clients that, once we can start establishing a relationship by talking about digital, we can start having a conversation about radio as well.

Here?s the deal: I can build a beautiful website for a client. If that client doesn?t tell people, via radio, TV, electronic media, about their beautiful website, it doesn?t really do any good. You can sell just digital, but there is no better advertising than word-of-mouth, and digital can?t create top-of-mind awareness or get a good buzz or create word-of-mouth about a business. The only way to do that is with, in my opinion, electronic media. I can?t create a jingle in the digital world and have someone remember a business through audio, through a jingle.

Where is this new digital money coming from?
Cuddeback:
It is coming from everywhere. It is coming from radio. It is coming from newspaper. It is coming from TV. That?s all people talk about now, it seems like. There is a car dealer in Vegas that moved from TV and radio and now spends 100 percent of his budget on digital. When you see things happen like that, you have to pay attention and get into that space.

How do you prevent your sellers from trading dollars?
Cuddeback:
That?s a really good question, because trading dollars from radio airtime into digital costs me money because of the hard costs of the digital products that we are selling. Although I am saving my airtime and able to sell my airtime to another client, it?s kind of a Catch-22. If I?m dealing with a radio station that has a lot of demand and typically in a sold-out situation, and that seller is trading dollars for digital, I am OK with it, because it frees airtime for me to sell to somebody else. In most cases, I don?t have a problem if they are moving off-air into digital.

You talk about salespeople being intimidated and salespeople not understanding. How do you fix that?
Cuddeback:
Well, right now, the way I am trying to fix it is to hire someone as a full-time digital director for my cluster that can show the other sellers that it is OK, they can sell this, and nothing is going to go completely and horribly wrong. The answer is really to have some of my sellers gravitate more to selling digital products and to hire someone who has been doing it for a number of years that can hold their hand and help them through the process.

What do salespeople need to do differently?
Cuddeback:
I want every salesperson that I have to be a solution provider and to be able to sell everything I have. That would be the ultimate goal, to really be a consultant and to be able to walk into a business and talk to the owner and have all of these solutions for them. That would be my ideal world, but I am not sure I want reps to be able to go into a business and say, ?Here?s radio and here is how it works. What?s going to happen when I run your radio schedule is people are going to go online and do their research. So, why don?t we help you with your website? Why don?t we help you with your search engine optimization, and do everything all at once?? In fact, we have a client now that is waiting to do radio with me until his website is right and until he has everything digitally where he needs to be, because he understands that he doesn?t want to spend a bunch of money in radio before his digital presence is correct. That?s kind of where I want my sellers to be.

Why do some people think radio doesn?t work anymore?
Cuddeback:
In today?s world, when I run a radio commercial, when it relates to getting business for that customer, guess who gets the credit? The Internet. I run a commercial, and you know how it goes. They hear 10 to 20 percent of what the message says. So they go on Google. They do the research. They find the business. They call the business. The business asks ?How did you hear about us?? and the person says, ?On the Internet.? That?s the big challenge. That, I think, is really damaging our business.

But aren?t we feeding that monster?
Cuddeback:
Yes. Because the businesses that want to find out where their customers are coming from, over the past few years, the Internet is their number one source for getting their clients. They forget that they have spent the last 10 years advertising their brand on radio. They forget that people have heard their commercial and are influenced by that commercial, enough so to go find them, search for them on the Internet, and then the Internet gets the business. In most business owners? minds, all this business is coming from the Internet ? when the fact is, it started way before the Internet.

As a manager, how do you keep track of all of that, and how do you manage your people and their level of knowledge?
Cuddeback:
It drives me absolutely crazy. You know, 20 years ago, we sold radio. That is all we sold. Now the salespeople are spinning 20 plates at one time and it is hard to focus on any one thing. There has been such a push to sell digital because of what is happening around us ? a lot of focus has left the pure radio play. That is really, really scaring me, because our eye is off our main source of revenue, which is radio. Managing the time that sellers
spend learning and selling digital versus pounding the pavement selling radio, is really scary. My boss, in fact, just the other day, asked me what percentage of our time I thought we should focus on digital. If you look at the big picture and say, ?Well, look at how much more money is being spent digitally, now surpassing radio,? you would think that a lot of your time would be spent selling digital. But then you?re putting your core business of radio in the back seat. And that really has me nervous.

Traci Northrop is director of sales for the Milwaukee Radio Group (Saga Communications) in Milwaukee.
What are the challenges of selling spots and digital in a digital world?
Northrop:
Well I think digital provides two opportunities. One is often forgotten, and that is that it?s an extension of our brand. It?s a way for us to reach our listeners on a level of ?Hey we?ve got this weekend special going on,? or ?Hey, join us at this event where we are going to register you to win a Harley-Davidson.? That?s the one we often forget about because everyone is just looking at this as a revenue stream. I don?t think we?ve figured out, as an industry, how to capitalize on it, or that we completely understand it, but we just know we should. So we are all just jumping on the bandwagon right now.

How does digital fit in a well-executed marketing campaign?
Northrop:
You have to be consistent, and it has to be an extension of something that brings it all back home. Like, ?I heard about the fact that I can win this prize, this Harley- Davidson, and now I received a text showing where I can now register to win it, and then I look at the website and I can see the whole list of events of where I can go.? We use it really well, and that?s how we have to teach our clients to use it, the same way we do. Fully integrated. Not as a standalone, but as part an overall campaign.

How do you monetize it in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
First of all, we won?t sell social media for the sake of pure advertising. Like, ?You should buy a car at this particular dealership.? But if we are going to be at that dealership and it?s a station event, then we can use our social media to help bring that traffic around and use it as one of the tools to increase our success at that event. For example, we won?t sell an ad on our Facebook page saying, ?You should call these people to cater your summer picnic.? We won?t do that. We will post on Facebook that we are going to be at this particular car dealership and you can meet this personality. So it?s definitely interwoven in everything. But it?s not a standalone. Otherwise it?s kind of like a sellout.

Do broadcast companies have an advantage with digital platforms?
Northrop:
There was a report out from Twitter that something like 8 percent of their online usage, or 23 million users, are actually bots! So how do you know what you?re getting? If you?re looking for numbers, they can generate massive numbers, but are they real? I would rather sell something I can believe in. That?s a combination of radio with the right amount of digital added on, when it makes sense. People are oftentimes asking for it and they don?t know what they are asking, or it?s just that shiny new thing.

That?s why we have to value our likes and our people more, because we?re not creating fake profiles to boost the numbers. These are actually people that said, ?I love WKLH.? These aren?t bots, they are people ? real people ? real traffic. Everyone that is engaged with us on social media is a real person. That?s why we have to value it more too.

What sort of training do reps need, and how do you provide it?
Northrop:
Well Saga has an interactive digital sales support team. We receive help from a platform basis where they will send out ideas and contests. We get good support with questions on how to understand things. We have people come to the market that show us better ideas, better ways of doing things. Then our digital guy, our website guy, is actually in our building. That?s another Saga great thing; not a lot of people can walk across the hall and talk to their Web dude. Which is what we call him: our Web dude.

Are radio and TV stations making money on digital?
Northrop:
I think we?d like to think so, but we don?t take the time to stop and actually figure out how to best charge for this and then get all of us on the same page. Some of us aren?t charging for it and just handing it out, number one. Number two, some people are acting like they are charging for it but they are not actually getting more money, they?re just reclassifying it in the budget line. So we are bamboozling ourselves.

So in some cases, when it?s a condition of being on the buy, if one group relents and says, ?OK, yeah, we?ll do that,? it kind of puts the rest of the groups in a bad position. Here we are trying to value what we have and what we?ve built, literally built from one user on. We?ve built our own Facebook page and we?ve put great content on there and we engage our listeners. And you?re going to give it away for free?

So we?ve got to unite and say, ?You know it?s not worth nothing, but it?s not worth top of the rate card. Somewhere in the middle, we have to meet.?

Are there dangers to selling digital?
Northrop:
If you lose sight of the fact that radio is your main product and this is just another great way to help reach your audience to generate traffic for your client, and to make your client memorable. Then you?re losing sight of everything. Then you can just go work for a dotcom company. If you?re in radio, you have to sell radio with digital. The message is clear. Stick to the core, but digital is something that can definitely help radio be more effective for ourselves and for our clients.

What digital products are working best for you in Milwaukee?
Northrop:
Saga does a really good job of maintaining our text clubs and giving people rewards for being members and engaging the customers. We have a process. If someone wants to get out a text, it?s not an ?OK.? We go through the program director and say, ?Does this make sense to you and can we encapsulate it in the amount of characters?? Texting works reallywell, Facebook works really well. Those are the two things I?ve found get the best results when used correctly.

Is digital here to stay?
Northrop:
It?s amazing, it?s like everyone is in a panic to participate. It?s like when all the radio stations went out to buy a PT Cruiser as a station vehicle, they were all the rage. You couldn?t even get them, they were in such demand. Now I don?t see anyone excited about PT Cruisers. Digital is like the PT Cruiser, except that it?s not going to go away. But it?s part of a five-course meal. We?re just adding courses and more ability to reach and engage people to get results for advertisers and to provide content for our listeners from our brands. The more we can engage, the more loyal they will be to us.

The consensus appears to be that digital offerings of broadcast companies are first and foremost an extension of your own brands. It allows them to connect more deeply and more frequently with their audience. As a result of that connection, they allow advertisers to utilize the digital presence of the station for their own marketing strategies. Stations, in turn, have a new source of revenue beyond traditional advertising.

My first foray into selling digital, back in 2006, was clearly a case of trading dollars. I felt I needed to leverage digital with radio because nobody believed in digital at the time. I know I didn?t. Today it?s hard not to believe in digital advertising?s ability to extend an already strong campaign. We have to resist, however, making digital more than what it is. It?s a tool.

Jeff Schmidt is EVP and partner with Chris Lytle at Sparque Inc.
You can reach him at Jeff.Schmidt@Sparque.biz,
Twitter: @JeffreyASchmidt

Send me your comments directly or post them below this story.

(9/26/2014 1:03:43 PM)
Digital pricing reflects the demand and the CPM is adjusted accordingly. Certainly there is fraud, but if the results aren't there the CPM will drop...simple supply and demand.

However, we directly attribute some of our client's traffic to bots - it's the same noise we all have. A TV spot on the bar monitor...a print ad in the back of the newsstand that is returned...or an unlit billboard at night.

Great article...exciting times...

(9/26/2014 9:53:10 AM)
Best piece I've read on the topic in a while! Thank you curating these perspectives and helping me focus my own.
(9/26/2014 8:40:38 AM)
Excellent and very insightful. Always go back to the base, radio and then "add the fries" to encompass both.

Add a Comment | View All Comments Send This Story To A Friend


View the original article here

The iHeartRadio Music Festival Numbers

9-25-14

iHeartMedia says the 2014 iHeartRadio Music Festival generated more than five billion social impressions, which is more than double the impressions from the 2013 show. Twitter generated two-thirds of the overall social media activity, followed by Facebook, Instagram, and Tumblr. Taylor Swift was the most discussed, followed by One Direction, Five Seconds of Summer, Ariana Grande, and Nicki Minaj.



View the original article here